Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 16, 2026

Ultrasonography of the Adult Male Urinary Tract for Urinary Functional Testing
Published on: August 14, 2019
Contrast-enhanced sonographic detection of vesicoureteral reflux in children: comparison with voiding
K Vassiou1, M Vlychou, R Moisidou
1Department of Radiology, University of Thessalia, Larissa, Greece. avassiou@med.uth.gr
Insights
Contrast-enhanced sonography (CES) accurately detects vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in children, showing higher sensitivity and specificity than traditional methods. This imaging technique is a reliable alternative for VUR diagnosis and follow-up.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Radiology
- Diagnostic Imaging
- Urology
Background:
- Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is a common condition in children, often diagnosed using radiographic voiding cystourethrography (VCUG).
- There is a need for alternative, potentially less invasive imaging modalities for VUR detection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To prospectively evaluate contrast-enhanced sonography (CES) as a diagnostic alternative to VCUG for detecting VUR in pediatric patients.
- To compare the efficacy of CES and VCUG in identifying renal units with VUR.
Main Methods:
- Seventy-six children (0-9 years) with suspected VUR underwent both CES and VCUG.
- CES involved instilling Levovist into the bladder, with reflux identified by hyperechogenic microbubbles in renal units.
- VCUG was performed subsequently through the same catheter for direct comparison.
Main Results:
- CES detected VUR in 24 renal units, while VCUG identified it in 18.
- CES demonstrated high sensitivity (96%), specificity (94.8%), positive predictive value (77.4%), and negative predictive value (99.2%) compared to VCUG.
- CES identified a statistically significant higher number of renal units with VUR than VCUG.
Conclusions:
- Contrast-enhanced sonography (CES) is an accurate and reliable method for detecting VUR in children.
- CES can serve as a valuable tool for VUR follow-up, potentially reducing the need for repeated radiographic examinations.
- While CES shows promise, it may not entirely replace VCUG in all clinical scenarios.
Purpose:
Prospective evaluation of contrast-enhanced sonography (CES) as an alternative to radiographic voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) in the detection of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR).
Materials And Methods:
Seventy-six children (age range: 0 - 9 years, mean age 1.4 years) with suspicion of VUR due to various indications were examined by contrast-enhanced sonography (CES) and VCUG. CES examination was performed after instillation of Levovist into the catheterized urinary bladder, which had been prefilled with normal saline. Reflux was diagnosed when hyperechogenic microbubbles were observed in the renal units. Thereafter, VCUG was performed in all patients through the same catheter. CES findings were compared to the results of VCUG.
Results:
CES showed VUR in 24 renal units whereas VCUG showed reflux in 18 renal units. With regard to the presence of VUR, the findings obtained by both methods were concordant in 17 renal units. Taking VCUG as the reference standard, the sensitivity of CES was 96 %, the specificity was 94.8 %, the positive predictive value 77.4 % and the negative predictive value 99.2 %. Additionally, McNemar test showed that CES detected a statistically significant higher number of renal units with VUR (p < 0.05).
Conclusion:
It is suggested that CES is an accurate and reliable imaging modality for the detection of VUR, although it cannot replace VCUG in some cases. In addition, CES can be recommended in the follow-up of VUR, reducing the number of radiographic investigations.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies II: Ultrasonography
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography
Imaging Studies V: Intravenous Urography and Retrograde Pyelography
Imaging Studies VI: Voiding Cystourethrography and Cystography
Urodynamic Studies: Uroflowmetry
Urologic Endoscopic Procedure: Cystoscopic Examination

