Related Experiment Videos
The problematic allure of the binary in nursing theoretical discourse
Sally E Thorne1, Angela D Henderson, Gladys I McPherson
1University of British Columbia School of Nursing, T201-2211 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 2B5. thorne@nursing.ubc.ca
Nursing Philosophy : an International Journal for Healthcare Professionals
|September 24, 2004
Summary
This study argues against simplistic binary thinking in nursing theory and global politics. Holding complex ideas in tension, rather than choosing one side, fosters critical engagement and dialogue for navigating social and moral complexities.
Area of Science:
- Nursing Theory
- Political Science
- Social Philosophy
Background:
- The world stage exhibits ideological positioning mirroring nursing theory's tendency to oversimplify complex ideas into binaries.
- This binary approach can lead to "othering," hindering critical engagement with multifaceted issues.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critique the uncritical adoption of binary positions in nursing and global discourse.
- To advocate for maintaining conceptual binaries in tension as a method for intellectual and ethical advancement.
Main Methods:
- Conceptual analysis of ideological positioning in global politics and nursing theory.
- Philosophical argumentation for embracing dialectical tension over simplistic dichotomies.
Main Results:
- Oversimplification into binary forms, prevalent in both global politics and nursing, impedes nuanced understanding.
- Adopting a binary stance often results in "othering," which obstructs productive discourse and critical thinking.
Conclusions:
- Holding complex ideas in tension, rather than reducing them to binaries, is essential for stimulating dialogue.
- This approach encourages deeper reasoning and innovative strategies for addressing the intricate social and moral challenges within nursing and beyond.