Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 7, 2026
Vein Interposition Model: A Suitable Model to Study Bypass Graft Patency
Published on: January 15, 2017
Applicability of distal protection for aortocoronary vein graft interventions in clinical practice
Verghese Mathew1, Ryan J Lennon, Charanjit S Rihal
1Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA. mathew.verghese@mayo.edu
Insights
Many patients undergoing saphenous vein graft interventions cannot use distal protection devices due to specific anatomical features. This limits treatment options for these critical coronary artery bypass grafts.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Interventions
- Vascular Surgery
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- Percutaneous revascularization of saphenous vein grafts carries risks.
- Distal protection devices mitigate adverse events but are not always feasible.
- Anatomical limitations can prevent the use of distal protection in vein grafts.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the suitability of saphenous vein grafts for percutaneous treatment with available distal protection devices.
- To identify angiographic characteristics that exclude grafts from distal protection use.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of consecutive saphenous vein graft interventions from May 2001 to April 2002.
- Analysis of 147 vein grafts from 127 patients.
- Evaluation of specific angiographic criteria for exclusion from distal protection (e.g., lesion location, graft diameter, total occlusion).
Main Results:
- 57% of grafts had exclusion criteria for balloon occlusion protection systems.
- 42% of grafts had exclusion criteria for filter devices.
- A significant proportion of treated vein grafts were unsuitable for available distal protection technologies.
Conclusions:
- Anatomical factors frequently preclude the use of current distal protection devices in saphenous vein graft interventions.
- This highlights a gap in technology for treating a substantial number of patients with diseased vein grafts.
- Further development of distal protection strategies is needed for complex vein graft anatomies.
Abstract:
Percutaneous revascularization of diseased saphenous vein grafts is associated with increased risk of adverse events, although the use of distal protection mitigates this to a significant extent. However, anatomic characteristics may preclude the use of such devices in a proportion of vein grafts intended for percutaneous treatment. We reviewed our consecutive experience of saphenous vein graft interventions from 1 May 2001 through 30 April 2002 to determine suitability for distal protection. Relevant angiographic characteristics included lesion within 5 mm of the ostium; lesion < 20 mm from the distal anastomosis; planned distal landing site of the occlusion balloon < 3 mm or > 6 mm in diameter; total occlusion of the vein graft; or lesion in a sequential vein graft distal to the first anastomosis. One hundred twenty-seven patients (140 procedures, 147 vein grafts) were treated. One or more of the angiographic exclusion criteria for a balloon occlusion protection system existed in 57% of grafts, while 42% had exclusions for a filter device. A large number of patients with vein graft disease intended for percutaneous treatment have anatomic exclusions to available distal protection technology.
More Related Videos
13:58A Rabbit Model of Durable Transgene Expression in Jugular Vein to Common Carotid Artery Interposition Grafts
Published on: September 10, 2018
07:02A Rabbit Venous Interposition Model Mimicking Revascularization Surgery using Vein Grafts to Assess Intimal Hyperplasia under Arterial Blood Pressure
Published on: May 15, 2020