Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Promotion as a factor in carcinogenesis.

C C Travis1, H Belefant

  • 1Risk Analysis Section, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, TN 37831-6109.

Toxicology Letters
|January 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cancer risk management A review of 132 federal regulatory decisions.

Environmental science & technology·2012
Same author

Bioconcentration of organics in beef, milk, and vegetation.

Environmental science & technology·2012
Same author

Determining an acceptable level of risk.

Environmental science & technology·2011
Same author

Drinking-water standards.

Environmental science & technology·2011
Same author

Effectiveness of Purge-and-Trap for Measurement of Volatile Organic Compounds in Aged Soils.

Analytical chemistry·2011
Same author

The genomic revolution: what does it mean for risk assessment?

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2002

Promotion involves increased cellular replication. This study argues that cytotoxicity is not essential for promotion, suggesting promotion thresholds are unlikely, impacting cancer research understanding.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Cell Biology
  • Carcinogenesis

Background:

  • Cellular replication is key in cancer development.
  • Promotion is defined as factors increasing replication of initiated cells.
  • Understanding promotion mechanisms is crucial for cancer prevention and treatment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To challenge the necessity of cytotoxicity in cellular promotion.
  • To investigate the implications of removing cytotoxicity from the definition of promotion.
  • To determine if a threshold for promotion exists.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of existing promotion models.
  • Review of literature on cellular replication and cytotoxicity.
  • Theoretical argumentation based on biological principles.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Cytotoxicity is not a required component for cellular promotion.
  • The absence of a mandatory cytotoxic element suggests promotion can occur without it.
  • The concept of a promotion threshold is challenged.

Conclusions:

  • Promotion is best understood as a process enhancing cellular replication, irrespective of cell death.
  • The absence of a cytotoxicity requirement implies that promotion may operate at lower exposure levels than previously thought.
  • Revisiting the definition of promotion may refine our understanding of carcinogenesis and inform targeted interventions.