Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 9, 2026

Establishment and Characterization of UTI and CAUTI in a Mouse Model
Published on: June 23, 2015
The case against screening urinalyses for asymptomatic bacteriuria in children
1Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle.
Insights
Routine screening for asymptomatic bacteriuria in children is not cost-effective. Current methods are inaccurate, leading to false positives and missed infections, without preventing kidney damage.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Nephrology
- Diagnostic Test Evaluation
- Public Health Policy
Background:
- Asymptomatic bacteriuria screening is recommended for children to prevent pyelonephritis and renal scarring.
- The cost-effectiveness of this screening practice remains unestablished.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the costs and benefits of screening asymptomatic, toilet-trained children for bacteriuria.
- To determine if current screening methods are effective in preventing adverse renal outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of published studies on screening for asymptomatic bacteriuria in children.
- Analysis of screening test sensitivity and specificity, bacteriuria prevalence, and associated costs.
- Evaluation of evidence linking bacteriuria detection to prevention of pyelonephritis and renal scarring.
Main Results:
- Screening 100,000 children yields nearly 20,000 false-positive results with current methods (80% sensitivity/specificity).
- The diagnostic process misses 28% of true bacteriuria cases and costs approximately $2.9 million.
- No evidence supports that detecting and treating asymptomatic bacteriuria prevents pyelonephritis or renal scarring.
Conclusions:
- Screening for asymptomatic bacteriuria in children is expensive and ineffective.
- Current screening practices fail to prevent pyelonephritis and renal scarring.
- Routine screening for asymptomatic bacteriuria should be discontinued in pediatric well-child care.
Abstract:
Screening children for asymptomatic bacteriuria to prevent pyelonephritis and renal scarring is widely recommended, but its cost-effectiveness has not been established. We reviewed published studies to determine the costs and benefits of screening toilet-trained, asymptomatic children for bacteriuria. Given the sensitivity and specificity of current screening methods (approximately 80% each) and the prevalence of bacteriuria in asymptomatic children (approximately 1% in girls and 0.03% in boys), screening 100,000 children would result in 19,897 (20%) false-positive tests; initial screening and two urine cultures to confirm the diagnosis of asymptomatic bacteriuria would miss 28% of 515 children with true bacteriuria, and cost nearly $2.9 million. There is no evidence that detection and treatment of children with asymptomatic bacteriuria prevents subsequent pyelonephritis or renal scarring. Screening for bacteriuria in asymptomatic children is costly, fails to prevent pyelonephritis or renal scarring, and should be discontinued as a part of routine well-child care.
More Related Videos
07:34Isolation of Single Intracellular Bacterial Communities Generated from a Murine Model of Urinary Tract Infection for Downstream Single-cell Analysis
Published on: April 16, 2019
08:53Recurrent Escherichia coli Urinary Tract Infection Triggered by Gardnerella vaginalis Bladder Exposure in Mice
Published on: December 4, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Urinary Tract Infection II: Pathophysiology
Urinary Tract Infection III: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Urinary Tract Infection IV: Nursing Management
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Urine Studies II: Urine Culture and Sensitivity Test
Microbiota of the Urogenital Tract