Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A comparison of two solid phase systems for antibody detection.

G M Haslam1, J Sajur, Y Fournier

  • 1MDS Laboratories, 100 International Blvd., Etobicoke, Ontario, Canada M9W 6J6.

Immunohematology
|January 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary

Two antibody detection methods, Capture-R (CR) and Capture-R Ready-Screen (RS), were evaluated for prenatal screening. Both methods proved acceptable, with CR showing slightly higher sensitivity and specificity in initial tests.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pain management decisions in emergency hospitals are predicted by brain activity during empathy and error monitoring.

British journal of anaesthesia·2019
Same author

Some LMAs are stiffer than others.

Anaesthesia·2015
Same author

First analysis of 10-year trends in national factor concentrates usage in haemophilia: data from CHARMS, the Canadian Hemophilia Assessment and Resource Management System.

Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia·2014
Same author

Meniscal ossicle in a professional soccer player.

Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR·2011
Same author

Isolated posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: is non-aggressive rehabilitation the right protocol?

Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR·2010
Same author

Efficacy of steinernematid nematodes against three insect pests of crucifers in quebec.

Journal of nematology·2009

Area of Science:

  • Immunology
  • Transfusion Medicine
  • Clinical Laboratory Science

Background:

  • Prenatal antibody screening is crucial for preventing hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn.
  • Existing serological methods require validation for accuracy and efficiency in clinical settings.
  • Solid phase methods offer potential advantages in antibody detection.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the acceptability of two solid phase antibody detection methods: Capture-R (CR) and Capture-R Ready-Screen (RS).
  • To evaluate the diagnostic performance (sensitivity and specificity) of CR and RS for prenatal antibody screening.

Main Methods:

  • A blinded study design was employed, comparing CR and RS against a saline antiglobulin test.
  • Ninety-six previously screened serum samples and 648 additional prenatal samples were tested across two laboratory sites.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Sensitivity and specificity were calculated based on the results from both sample sets.

    • Main Results:

    • For the initial 96 samples, CR demonstrated 95% sensitivity and 90% specificity, while RS showed 90% sensitivity and 89% specificity.
    • CR detected specific antibodies missed by RS, including anti-K, -Ch, -Jka, -Lea, -Fya, -Mca, and -e.
    • For the larger cohort of 648 samples, CR achieved 100% sensitivity and specificity, and RS achieved 97% sensitivity and 100% specificity.

    Conclusions:

    • Both Capture-R and Capture-R Ready-Screen are acceptable techniques for prenatal antibody screening.
    • CR exhibited slightly superior performance, particularly in the larger parallel testing group.
    • These solid phase methods can be reliably implemented in routine prenatal antibody screening protocols.