Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Tuning and comparing spatial normalization methods.

Steven Robbins1, Alan C Evans, D Louis Collins

  • 1McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, 3801 University Street, Montreal, Que., H3A 2B4, Canada.

Medical Image Analysis
|September 29, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Multiscale characterization of the human claustrum from histology to MRI.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

CIVET-Chimp: An automated pipeline for MRI-based cortical surface extraction in chimpanzees.

Neuroimage. Reports·2026
Same author

Organization, fine structure, and stereotaxic maps of the human Bed nucleus of the Stria terminalis.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same author

Comprehensive large-scale analyses reveal association between brain structure and cognitive ability during adolescence.

Communications biology·2026
Same author

Microstructural profiles of the human superficial white matter and their associations to cortical geometry and connectivity.

PLoS biology·2026
Same author

Early White Matter Microstructure Alterations in Infants with Down Syndrome.

NeuroImage·2025
Same journal

ContiMorph: An unsupervised learning framework for cardiac motion tracking with time-continuous diffeomorphism.

Medical image analysis·2026
Same journal

MedP-CLIP: Medical CLIP with region-aware prompt integration.

Medical image analysis·2026
Same journal

Multi-organ guided diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment via hierarchical alignment and knowledge distillation.

Medical image analysis·2026
Same journal

SUDA: Simultaneous unsupervised knowledge distillation and adaptation of foundation models for efficient pathological image analysis.

Medical image analysis·2026
Same journal

Beyond the LUMIR challenge: The pathway to foundational registration models.

Medical image analysis·2026
Same journal

Annotation-efficient medical image segmentation via cross-latent graphs and vector-quantized memory.

Medical image analysis·2026
See all related articles

This study introduces a principled method for evaluating spatial normalization algorithms and their parameters. This approach aids in selecting optimal methods for neuroimaging analysis, improving brain structure and function studies.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroimaging
  • Medical Image Analysis
  • Computational Neuroscience

Background:

  • Spatial normalization is crucial for analyzing brain structure and function across different individuals using MRI, fMRI, and PET.
  • Numerous 2D surface and 3D image deformation algorithms exist, but design choices and parameter selection remain debated.
  • Current methods often require user-defined parameters, introducing variability and potential bias.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a principled and objective method for evaluating spatial normalization algorithms and their parameters.
  • To provide a framework for comparing different spatial normalization techniques.
  • To enhance the reliability and reproducibility of neuroimaging studies.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a systematic approach for assessing the performance of spatial normalization algorithms.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Application of the proposed method to evaluate design choices and parameter values for 3D image registration.
  • Demonstration of the method's utility in analyzing a non-affine registration algorithm for 3D images and a registration algorithm for 2D cortical surfaces.

    • Main Results:

    • The proposed method offers a quantitative basis for evaluating and comparing spatial normalization algorithms.
    • Performance analysis of a non-affine registration algorithm for 3D images was conducted.
    • A registration algorithm for 2D cortical surfaces was also evaluated using the developed methodology.

    Conclusions:

    • The presented principled method facilitates objective evaluation of spatial normalization techniques and parameter selection.
    • This approach can significantly improve the accuracy and consistency of cross-sectional neuroimaging studies.
    • The findings support the development of more robust and reliable brain image analysis pipelines.