Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

What causes scale errors in children?

Scott Glover1

  • 1Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, Surrey TW20 0EX, UK. scott.glover@rhul.ac.uk

Trends in Cognitive Sciences
|September 29, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Online versus cognitive control: A dividing line between physical action and motor imagery.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2025
Same author

A Qualitative Investigation into the Experiences of Students with Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD/Dyspraxia) in Higher Education.

European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education·2024
Same author

TMS over dorsolateral prefrontal cortex affects the timing of motor imagery but not overt action: Further support for the motor-cognitive model.

Behavioural brain research·2022
Same author

Assessing evidence for replication: A likelihood-based approach.

Behavior research methods·2020
Same author

Executive functions in motor imagery: support for the motor-cognitive model over the functional equivalence model.

Experimental brain research·2020
Same author

Solo versus joint bimanual coordination.

Experimental brain research·2018
Same journal

Misinformation as strategy: Epistemic consequences and the undermining of shared truth.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Geographical psychology: Spatial variation in psychological phenomena and their consequences.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Multi-brain neurofeedback: what are we training for?

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

The developing vocal self.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Searching beyond decrements: Attentional guidance across the adult lifespan.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Looking into working memory through micro eye movements.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
See all related articles

Young children make scale errors when interacting with toy replicas, acting as if the toy were full-sized. This developmental finding offers insights into perception-action and planning-control models of vision for action.

Area of Science:

  • Developmental Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Action planning in children is complex.
  • Scale errors occur when children interact with scaled-down object replicas.
  • These errors involve inappropriate actions but accurate execution based on the object's true size.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To document and analyze the phenomenon of scale errors in young children's action planning.
  • To investigate the implications of scale errors for understanding perception-action and planning-control models.
  • To examine how children's actions are guided by object properties despite representational errors.

Main Methods:

  • Observational studies of children interacting with toy replicas.
  • Analysis of action selection and execution accuracy.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison of children's actions with the properties of both the replica and the full-sized object.

    • Main Results:

    • Children consistently make scale errors, applying actions appropriate for the full-sized object to its smaller replica.
    • Despite inappropriate action selection, the motor execution accurately reflects the replica's actual size.
    • The findings highlight a dissociation between representational understanding and motor control.

    Conclusions:

    • Scale errors provide a unique window into the development of action planning and representational abilities.
    • This phenomenon challenges and informs models of vision for action, particularly the interplay between perception, planning, and control.
    • Further research can utilize scale errors to test specific predictions of cognitive and neural models of action.