Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2026

A Murine Model of Stent Implantation in the Carotid Artery for the Study of Restenosis
Published on: May 14, 2013
Survival after coronary revascularization among patients with kidney disease
Brenda R Hemmelgarn1, Danielle Southern, Bruce F Culleton
1Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. brenda.hemmelgarn@calgaryhealthregion.ca.
Insights
Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) improved survival for kidney disease patients, including those on dialysis. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) also benefited dialysis patients but not those with non-dialysis-dependent kidney disease compared to no revascularization.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Nephrology
- Outcomes Research
Background:
- Optimal revascularization strategy for patients with kidney disease remains unclear.
- Kidney function varies, impacting treatment decisions and outcomes.
- Three patient groups were studied: dialysis-dependent kidney disease, non-dialysis-dependent kidney disease, and a reference group.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare survival rates among different revascularization strategies in patients with varying degrees of kidney function.
- To determine the effectiveness of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) versus no revascularization in kidney disease patients.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcomes Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease (APPROACH) database.
- Survival data analyzed for 40,374 patients, including 662 dialysis-dependent and 750 non-dialysis-dependent kidney disease patients.
- Adjusted 8-year survival rates compared for CABG, PCI, and no revascularization (NR) across kidney function categories.
Main Results:
- In the reference group, CABG (85.5%) and PCI (80.4%) showed significantly better survival than NR (72.3%).
- In non-dialysis kidney disease patients, CABG (45.9%) improved survival versus NR (29.7%), but PCI (32.7%) did not significantly differ from NR.
- In dialysis-dependent kidney disease patients, CABG (44.8%) and PCI (41.2%) were associated with better survival than NR (30.4%).
Conclusions:
- CABG is associated with improved survival across all kidney function levels compared to no revascularization.
- PCI offers survival benefits for reference and dialysis-dependent kidney disease patients but not for non-dialysis-dependent kidney disease patients.
- The presence of kidney disease or dialysis dependence should not preclude revascularization, especially CABG.
Background:
The optimal approach to revascularization in patients with kidney disease has not been determined. We studied survival by treatment group (CABG, percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI], or no revascularization) for patients with 3 categories of kidney function: dialysis-dependent kidney disease, non-dialysis-dependent kidney disease, and a reference group (serum creatinine <2.3 mg/dL).
Methods And Results:
Data were derived from the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcomes Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease (APPROACH), which captures information on all patients undergoing cardiac catheterization in Alberta, Canada. Characteristics and patient survival in 662 dialysis patients (1.6%) and 750 non-dialysis-dependent kidney disease patients (1.8%) were compared with the remainder of the 40,374 patients (96.6%). For the reference group, the adjusted 8-year survival rates for CABG, PCI, and no revascularization (NR) were 85.5%, 80.4%, and 72.3%, respectively (P<0.001 for CABG versus NR; P<0.001 for PCI versus NR). Adjusted survival rates were 45.9% for CABG, 32.7% for PCI, and 29.7% for NR in the nondialysis kidney disease group (P<0.001 for CABG versus NR; P=0.48 for PCI versus NR) and 44.8% for CABG, 41.2% for PCI, and 30.4% for NR in the dialysis group (P=0.003 for CABG versus NR; P=0.03 for PCI versus NR).
Conclusions:
Compared with no revascularization, CABG was associated with better survival in all categories of kidney function. PCI was also associated with a lower risk of death than no revascularization in reference patients and dialysis-dependent kidney disease patients but not in patients with non-dialysis-dependent kidney disease. The presence of kidney disease or dependence on dialysis should not be a deterrent to revascularization, particularly with CABG.
More Related Videos
09:12Surgical Swine Model of Chronic Cardiac Ischemia Treated by Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
Published on: March 27, 2018
07:25Predicting Amputation using Local Circulating Mononuclear Progenitor Cells in Angioplasty-treated Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia
Published on: September 22, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Imbalances in Cardiac Output
CHF can occur due to the failure of either side of the heart. Left-side failure leads to pulmonary congestion—the right side continues to send blood...
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care