Survival after coronary revascularization among patients with kidney disease

Brenda R Hemmelgarn1, Danielle Southern, Bruce F Culleton

  • 1Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. brenda.hemmelgarn@calgaryhealthregion.ca.

Circulation
|September 29, 2004
PubMed

Insights

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) improved survival for kidney disease patients, including those on dialysis. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) also benefited dialysis patients but not those with non-dialysis-dependent kidney disease compared to no revascularization.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Nephrology
  • Outcomes Research

Background:

  • Optimal revascularization strategy for patients with kidney disease remains unclear.
  • Kidney function varies, impacting treatment decisions and outcomes.
  • Three patient groups were studied: dialysis-dependent kidney disease, non-dialysis-dependent kidney disease, and a reference group.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare survival rates among different revascularization strategies in patients with varying degrees of kidney function.
  • To determine the effectiveness of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) versus no revascularization in kidney disease patients.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcomes Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease (APPROACH) database.
  • Survival data analyzed for 40,374 patients, including 662 dialysis-dependent and 750 non-dialysis-dependent kidney disease patients.
  • Adjusted 8-year survival rates compared for CABG, PCI, and no revascularization (NR) across kidney function categories.

Main Results:

  • In the reference group, CABG (85.5%) and PCI (80.4%) showed significantly better survival than NR (72.3%).
  • In non-dialysis kidney disease patients, CABG (45.9%) improved survival versus NR (29.7%), but PCI (32.7%) did not significantly differ from NR.
  • In dialysis-dependent kidney disease patients, CABG (44.8%) and PCI (41.2%) were associated with better survival than NR (30.4%).

Conclusions:

  • CABG is associated with improved survival across all kidney function levels compared to no revascularization.
  • PCI offers survival benefits for reference and dialysis-dependent kidney disease patients but not for non-dialysis-dependent kidney disease patients.
  • The presence of kidney disease or dialysis dependence should not preclude revascularization, especially CABG.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Imbalances in Cardiac Output01:26

Imbalances in Cardiac Output

The heart's primary function is to pump blood throughout the body, maintaining a balance between blood sent out (cardiac output) and blood returning (venous return). If this balance is disrupted, it can result in congestive heart failure (CHF), a severe condition where the heart becomes an inefficient pump, leading to inadequate blood circulation.
CHF can occur due to the failure of either side of the heart. Left-side failure leads to pulmonary congestion—the right side continues to send blood...
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management01:25

Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management

Aortic regurgitation (AR) is when the aortic valve does not close or seal properly, leading to backward blood circulation from the aorta into the left ventricle during diastole. Common causes of AR include rheumatic heart disease, congenital valve defects, and aortic root dilation. Managing AR requires a multifaceted approach to alleviate symptoms, preserve left ventricular function, and address the underlying cause of the regurgitation. Patients with symptomatic AR or significant left...
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care01:27

Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care

Interprofessional care for coronary artery disease includes pharmacological therapy and revascularization procedures.Pharmacological therapy for Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) aims to manage symptoms, prevent complications, and improve patient outcomes through various classes of medications:Antiplatelet Agents:Aspirin and Clopidogrel: These medications inhibit platelet aggregation, preventing blood clots, which is crucial for avoiding heart attacks and strokes. Doctors often prescribe these...
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation01:30

Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation

Heart failure can be classified in various ways, with the most common classifications based on physical activity limitations, disease progression, severity, and treatment strategies.The Functional Classification of Heart Failure divides patients into four categories based on physical activity limitation due to symptom burden.Class I: Patients in this class have cardiac disease but no physical activity limitations. Ordinary activities like walking, climbing stairs, or routine tasks do not cause...
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy01:30

Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy

Dilated cardiomyopathy, or DCM, is a progressive myocardial disorder characterized by ventricular chamber dilation and contractile dysfunction.EtiologyVarious factors can cause DCM, including hypertension and heavy alcohol intake, which contribute to the weakening and enlargement of the heart muscle. Viral infections, such as Coxsackievirus B, adenoviruses, and influenza, can lead to DCM by causing inflammation and damage to heart tissue. Certain chemotherapeutic agents, including daunorubicin,...
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care01:29

Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care

Managing cardiomyopathy involves addressing underlying or precipitating causes, treating heart failure with medications, and implementing dietary changes and a balanced exercise and rest regimen.Lifestyle ModificationsCardiomyopathy patients should adopt a low-sodium diet to reduce fluid retention and manage heart failure. A personalized exercise and rest plan helps maintain physical fitness without overstraining the heart. Avoiding alcohol and tobacco is essential to prevent further damage to...