Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Least restrictive environment and the courts.

Stephen Aldersley1

  • 1National Technical Institute for the Deaf, Rochester Institute of Technology, 1 Lomb Memorial Drive, Rochester, NY 14623. SFANCE@rit.edu

Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education
|September 29, 2004
PubMed
Summary

Federal courts have interpreted the least restrictive environment (LRE) clause of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) differently over time, impacting deaf children's educational placements. Analysis reviews key cases and suggests a need for balanced approaches.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Focus-on-form instructional methods promote deaf college students' improvement in English grammar.

Journal of deaf studies and deaf educationยท2006
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Education Law
  • Disability Studies
  • Public Policy

Background:

  • The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) mandates the least restrictive environment (LRE) for students with disabilities.
  • Judicial interpretation of the LRE clause has evolved since the IDEA's inception in 1975.
  • The educational placement of deaf children has been a focal point in LRE litigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze U.S. federal court interpretations of the IDEA's LRE clause.
  • To examine the historical evolution of LRE judicial review.
  • To assess the impact of LRE rulings on the educational placement of deaf children.

Main Methods:

  • Historical analysis of legal precedents.
  • Review of federal court cases (district and appeals levels) concerning LRE and deaf children's education.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of the political and legal evolution of the LRE concept.

    • Main Results:

    • Early judicial interpretations of LRE during the 1980s and early 1990s are charted.
    • Key federal appeals and district court cases involving deaf children's educational placement under LRE are reviewed.
    • Analysis reveals shifts in judicial reasoning regarding LRE compliance.

    Conclusions:

    • The interpretation of LRE by federal courts has varied significantly.
    • Litigation has shaped the educational opportunities for deaf children within the LRE framework.
    • A more balanced judicial approach to LRE for deaf students is suggested for future educational policy.