Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Commentary: setting aside tradition when dealing with endocrine disruptors.

Theo Colborn1

  • 1University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.

ILAR Journal
|September 30, 2004
PubMed
Summary

Developing effective screens for endocrine-disrupting chemicals requires novel toxicological approaches, not traditional methods. New strategies must consider animal strain and diet sensitivities for accurate safety standards.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Is it time to reassess current safety standards for glyphosate-based herbicides?

Journal of epidemiology and community health·2017
Same author

Minireview: Endocrine Disruptors: Past Lessons and Future Directions.

Molecular endocrinology (Baltimore, Md.)·2016
Same author

Concerns over use of glyphosate-based herbicides and risks associated with exposures: a consensus statement.

Environmental health : a global access science source·2016
Same author

Correction to New Look at BTEX: Are Ambient Levels a Problem?

Environmental science & technology·2015
Same author

New Look at BTEX: Are Ambient Levels a Problem?

Environmental science & technology·2015
Same author

Regulatory decisions on endocrine disrupting chemicals should be based on the principles of endocrinology.

Reproductive toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.)·2013

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Toxicology
  • Endocrinology

Background:

  • The US Congress mandated the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in 1996 to develop detection methods for estrogenic and endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) in food and water.
  • Despite the mandate, effective screening assays for EDCs have not yet been established, indicating a significant gap in regulatory science.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the need for novel approaches in developing assays for endocrine-disrupting chemicals.
  • To emphasize the limitations of traditional toxicology in addressing complex endocrine system interactions.
  • To advocate for a paradigm shift in toxicological research methodologies.

Main Methods:

  • Critically reviewing historical toxicological approaches and their shortcomings in EDC detection.
  • Identifying key factors, such as animal strain and diet, that influence endocrine system sensitivity.
  • Proposing the integration of recent scientific understanding of endocrine system complexity into assay development.

Main Results:

  • Traditional toxicological methods have proven insufficient for developing reliable EDC detection screens.
  • Historical studies often overlooked crucial variables like animal strain and diet, leading to inaccurate results.
  • A significant body of knowledge on endocrine system sensitivity and complexity has emerged in the last decade.

Conclusions:

  • A fundamental re-evaluation of toxicological dogma is necessary to create effective EDC testing protocols.
  • Future assay development must incorporate advanced understanding of endocrine system biology and carefully control variables like animal strain and diet.
  • Adopting new approaches is critical to avoid further wastage of resources and animal lives in validating inadequate assays and setting safety standards.

Related Experiment Videos