Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Mind the gap: interhemispheric communication about emotional faces.

Rebecca J Compton1, Kristen Wilson, Kate Wolf

  • 1Department of Psychology, Haverford College, PA 19041, USA. rcompton@haverford.edu

Emotion (Washington, D.C.)
|October 1, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Identification of the First CHeRI Orbivirus 3-5 Strain Isolated from a Dead Farmed White-Tailed Deer (<i>Odocoileus virginianus)</i> Whose Death Had Been Attributed to an Infection by Mule Deerpox Virus.

Viruses·2026
Same author

A comparison of conventional methods and mosquito blood meal analysis to assess vertebrate diversity.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

A Novel Ephemero- and a New CHeRI Orbivirus Isolated from a Dead Farmed White-Tailed Deer (<i>Odocoileus virginianus</i>) in Florida, USA.

Viruses·2025
Same author

Adversity and error-monitoring: Effects of emotional context.

Psychophysiology·2024
Same author

Effects of task context on EEG correlates of mind-wandering.

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience·2023
Same author

Does early adversity predict executive functioning difficulties among undergraduates? Dissociations among self-report, performance, and EEG measures.

Neuropsychology·2023
Same journal

Interactive effects of age and mindfulness on emotion regulation flexibility: Evidence from a daily diary study.

Emotion (Washington, D.C.)·2026
Same journal

Childhood threat exposure and poor emotional awareness predict neural correlates of emotion regulation in adolescent girls.

Emotion (Washington, D.C.)·2026
Same journal

Intensity, desirability, and attainability: Predictors of effort in emotion regulation among healthy and depressed individuals.

Emotion (Washington, D.C.)·2026
Same journal

Effort shapes empathy: Distinct aftereffects of cognitive and physical exertion on pain empathy.

Emotion (Washington, D.C.)·2026
Same journal

An unequal exchange: A within-person examination of conversation role on intra- and interpersonal outcomes of co-ruminative conversations.

Emotion (Washington, D.C.)·2026
Same journal

The interdependence of emotion regulation in romantic couples: A longitudinal dyadic analysis of six strategies.

Emotion (Washington, D.C.)·2026
See all related articles

Situational factors and individual differences impact how the brain communicates about emotional faces. Specifically, evaluating faces enhances communication for angry expressions, while worry levels affect processing of angry stimuli.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Social Psychology
  • Emotional Processing

Background:

  • Interhemispheric communication facilitates information processing.
  • Emotional stimuli capture attention and influence cognitive processes.
  • Situational context and individual traits can modulate emotional responses.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how situational factors (evaluation vs. nonevaluation) influence interhemispheric communication of emotional faces.
  • To examine the role of individual differences (worry) in interhemispheric communication of emotional faces.
  • To test the hypothesis that emotional relevance modulates interhemispheric communication.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed a face-matching task with angry and happy faces.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Stimuli were presented within a single visual field or across opposite visual fields.
  • Situational conditions varied between evaluative and nonevaluative contexts.

    • Main Results:

    • An across-field advantage (AFA) indicated benefits of interhemispheric sharing.
    • The AFA for angry faces was greater than for happy faces under evaluation.
    • High trait worry correlated with reduced interhemispheric communication for angry faces.

    Conclusions:

    • Situational factors, such as evaluation, modulate interhemispheric communication of emotional stimuli.
    • Individual differences in worry levels impact the brain's ability to communicate about threat-related (angry) faces.
    • Findings support a threat-avoidance model of worry and highlight the interplay between context, individual traits, and emotional processing.