Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 21, 2026

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning
Published on: November 2, 2012
The making of meaning: comments on Hofstee and Ten Berge
1Farleigh Dickinson University, School of Psychology, Teaneck-Hackensack Campus, Teaneck, NJ 07666, USA. mcgrath@fdu.edu
Abstract:
Hofstee and Ten Berge (2004/this issue) outline a method of scale transformation that places scores on a common absolute scale. This contrasts with traditional relative methods of transformation, which involve scaling in relation to a sample mean. Their primary intention seems to be to produce a scale that is intrinsically meaningful. This issue of scale meaning is discussed in some detail, including reference to an alternate approach to absolute scaling offered by Cohen, Cohen, Aiken, and West (1999). Ultimately, neither approach to absolute scaling seems completely satisfactory as a resolution to this problem. It is suggested that the lack of meaning inherent to many psychosocial measures is a natural product of traditional aggregative practices in scale development and may be invulnerable to statistical correction.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
Framing Effects
Reason and Intuition
Structuralism
Titchener's approach to structuralism was unique. He employed introspection, a method...
Attribution Theory
Fundamental Attribution Error

