Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

On modeling locus heterogeneity using mixture distributions.

Shili Lin1, Swati Biswas

  • 1Department of Statistics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA. shili@stat.ohio-state.edu <shili@stat.ohio-state.edu>

BMC Genetics
|October 2, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

CBCRisk-Mastectomy: A Prediction Tool to Aid Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy Decision- making.

The Journal of surgical research·2026
Same author

Engineering copper nanoparticle/polysaccharide-immobilized cotton gauze for accelerated healing of <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>-infected dermal wounds.

Journal of materials chemistry. B·2026
Same author

CBCRisk-Mastectomy: A Risk Prediction Tool to Aid Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy Decision Making.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Refining the Definition for "Low Risk" in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Time to Reduce Morbidity and Mortality.

JACC. Heart failure·2026
Same author

Reply to Blette and Kawut: Surrogate Endpoints are Risky Business in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.

American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine·2026
Same author

Modulating IL-1β-induced pro-atherogenic endothelial responses through drug repurposing.

Inflammopharmacology·2026
Same journal

Geographic distribution of sex chromosome polymorphism in Anastrepha fraterculus sp. 1 from Argentina.

BMC genetics·2020
Same journal

Development and characterization of a pupal-colour based genetic sexing strain of Anastrepha fraterculus sp. 1 (Diptera: Tephritidae).

BMC genetics·2020
Same journal

Improvement on the genetic engineering of an invasive agricultural pest insect, the cherry vinegar fly, Drosophila suzukii.

BMC genetics·2020
Same journal

Precise single base substitution in the shibire gene by CRISPR/Cas9-mediated homology directed repair in Bactrocera tryoni.

BMC genetics·2020
Same journal

Climate stress resistance in male Queensland fruit fly varies among populations of diverse geographic origins and changes during domestication.

BMC genetics·2020
Same journal

Genetic structure and symbiotic profile of worldwide natural populations of the Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata.

BMC genetics·2020
See all related articles

The admixture approach for complex genetic traits may yield inconsistent results. A key parameter is not always well-defined, and validation conditions do not guarantee accurate gene mapping estimates.

Area of Science:

  • Genetics
  • Statistical genetics

Background:

  • Locus heterogeneity complicates gene mapping for complex traits.
  • The admixture approach models linkage data using finite mixture distributions.
  • A single parameter estimates the proportion of families linked to a disease gene.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the general definition of the admixture approach's single parameter.
  • To evaluate a literature-based condition for validating the admixture approach.

Main Methods:

  • Formulating likelihoods under a classification scheme.
  • Developing a counter example to test validation conditions.

Main Results:

  • The single parameter for linked proportion is meaningful only under specific conditions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • A previously cited validation condition does not ensure valid estimates.
  • Conclusions:

    • Estimators from the admixture approach can be inconsistent.
    • Inconsistency persists even when validation conditions are met.