Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Lessons from the ARDS network ventilator trial design controversy.

Hasan Shanawani1

  • 1Duke University, Box 90141, Durham, NC 27705, USA. Hasan.shanawani@duke.edu

Respiratory Care Clinics of North America
|October 2, 2004
PubMed
Summary

This review examines the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network (ARDSnet) trials and the scientific debates surrounding them. It highlights challenges in research, uncertainty evolution, and factors influencing scientific disagreements in critical care trials.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Defining the Time-limited Trial for Patients with Critical Illness: An Official American Thoracic Society Workshop Report.

Annals of the American Thoracic Society·2023
Same author

Evolving Sex and Gender in Electronic Health Records.

Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS·2019
Same author

What Is Sepsis?

American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine·2017
Same author

Root Cause Analysis of ICU Adverse Events in the Veterans Health Administration.

Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety·2017
Same author

Epidemiologic Review of Veterans Health Administration Patients with Isolation of Nontuberculous Mycobacteria after Cardiopulmonary Bypass Procedures.

Infection control and hospital epidemiology·2017
Same author

What is Hemodialysis?

American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine·2017

Area of Science:

  • Critical Care Medicine
  • Clinical Trials Methodology
  • Medical Research Ethics

Background:

  • The Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network (ARDSnet) conducted pivotal trials in critical care.
  • These trials generated significant scientific debate among researchers and clinicians.
  • Understanding these debates offers insights into research evolution and challenges.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the published literature concerning the ARDSnet trials.
  • To summarize the scientific controversies and debates surrounding major ARDSnet trials.
  • To explore the evolution of scientific uncertainty and its impact on large-scale clinical research.

Main Methods:

  • Comprehensive literature review of published studies on ARDSnet.
  • Analysis of the discourse and arguments presented by supporters and detractors of ARDSnet trials.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of the historical context and scientific framing of the debates.

    • Main Results:

    • The ARDSnet trials faced considerable challenges from organizers, supporters, and critics.
    • Scientific uncertainty evolves, influencing the design and interpretation of large national and international trials.
    • The framing of scientific disagreements significantly impacts their resolution.

    Conclusions:

    • Performing outcome studies and clinical trials in critically ill patients with complex syndromes presents substantial obstacles.
    • Effective treatments for complex critical illnesses remain a challenge, underscoring the need for robust research methodologies.
    • The study illustrates difficulties in conducting clinical trials for conditions lacking effective treatments.