Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Cycling with a visual handicap].

H Wilhelm1, B Endres

  • 1Abt. für Pathophysiologie des Sehens und Neuroophthalmologie, Universitäts-Augenklinik, Tübingen. wilhelm@uni-tuebingen.de

Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift Der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft
|October 2, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Noise patterns in visceral surgical procedures: Analysis of second-by-second dBA data of 599 procedures over the course of one year.

Scientific reports·2020
Same author

Processing two-dimensional X-ray diffraction and small-angle scattering data in <i>DAWN 2</i>.

Journal of applied crystallography·2017
Same author

[Efferent pupillary defects : Anisocoria and impaired light reaction].

Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft·2017
Same author

[Doctor and Patient Do Not See Anything].

Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde·2015
Same author

[Iris Mammillation].

Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde·2015
Same author

[Non-Arteritic Ischemic Optic Neuropathy (NAION)].

Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde·2015
Same journal

["DOG 2020 online" - for the first time in the von Graefe year].

Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft·2024
Same journal

[Are organ and co-cultures an alternative to animal models in ophthalmology?]

Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft·2022
Same journal

[Pediatric corneal opacities : Even small improvements provide lifelong help].

Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft·2022
Same journal

[Myxoma of the conjunctiva].

Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft·2022
Same journal

[Secondary open-angle glaucoma: uveitic secondary glaucoma, steroid-induced glaucoma, posttraumatic and postoperative glaucoma, tumor-related glaucoma and glaucoma due to elevated episcleral venous pressure].

Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft·2022
Same journal

[Artificial intelligence in the management of anti-VEGF treatment: the Vienna fluid monitor in clinical practice].

Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft·2022
See all related articles

Visually impaired individuals with acuity below 0.1 or a visual field less than 60 degrees face significant challenges cycling safely. Higher visual acuity and wider visual fields improve cycling safety for those with macular or tapetoretinal degeneration.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Rehabilitation Science
  • Transportation Safety

Background:

  • Bicycling is a common mode of transportation and recreation.
  • Visual impairments, such as macular or tapetoretinal degeneration, can significantly impact an individual's ability to engage in activities like cycling.
  • Understanding the specific visual requirements for safe cycling is crucial for visually impaired individuals.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the bicycling habits and visual capabilities of individuals with visual impairments.
  • To determine the visual acuity, visual field, and scotoma parameters necessary for safe cycling.

Main Methods:

  • A survey was conducted using a questionnaire distributed to patients aged 14-60 years.
  • Participants had macular or tapetoretinal degeneration without other significant handicaps.

Related Experiment Videos

  • 232 valid questionnaires were analyzed.

    • Main Results:

    • Only 15% of patients with visual acuity below 0.1 could cycle safely; this increased to 67% with acuity above 0.2.
    • Safe cycling was reported by 40% of individuals with visual fields larger than 60 degrees, compared to 18% with fields between 20-60 degrees.
    • A central scotoma greater than 10 degrees reduced safe cycling to 21%, while smaller scotomas allowed safe cycling in 47% of cases.

    Conclusions:

    • Visual acuity below 0.1 is insufficient for safe cycling, and below 0.2 increases accident risk.
    • A visual field diameter below 60 degrees or a central scotoma exceeding 10 degrees significantly compromises safe cycling.
    • These findings highlight critical visual thresholds for enabling safe cycling among visually impaired individuals.