Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 21, 2026

Scleral Cross-linking Using Riboflavin and Ultraviolet-A Radiation for Prevention of Axial Myopia in a Rabbit Model
Published on: April 3, 2016
Surfactant and UV-B-induced damage of the cultured bovine lens
Hyun-Yi Youn1, Kelley L Moran, Olanrewaju M Oriowo
1School of Optometry, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada N2L 3G1.
Purpose:
To evaluate in vitro methods for testing the toxicity of the surfactants, sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and benzalkonium chloride (BAK), and Ultraviolet (UV)-B radiation to the bovine lens.
Methods:
Lenses were dissected from bovine eyes--obtained from a local abattoir--and incubated in M199 culture medium at 37 degrees C, with 4% CO(2) and 96% air atmosphere. For the SDS and BAK experiments, the lenses (n = 153) were exposed directly to 0.001%, 0.01%, 0.1%, and 1.0% solutions for 15 min. These lenses were then rinsed five times each with saline and medium. Another group of lenses (n = 36) was irradiated with broadband UV-B at energy levels of 1.0 and 2.0 J/cm(2) (0.445 and 0.89 J/cm(2) in the biologically effective energy levels). For all of the above experiments, lens optical quality and cellular viability of lens epithelial cells were evaluated.
Results:
The analysis of optical quality, using a scanning laser in vitro assay system, of exposed lenses treated with SDS and BAK at concentrations of 0.01%, 0.1%, and 1.0%, and with UV-B at energy levels of 0.445 and 0.89 J/cm(2) showed a dose- and time-dependent increase in back vertex distance (BVD) variability, indicating loss of sharp focus in comparison with control lenses. Both 0.001% SDS and 0.001% BAK-treated lenses did not show any optical damage until 8-days after exposure. Lenses treated with 0.01% SDS showed recovery from optical damage 6-days later after exposure. Optical damage was not shown immediately for UV-B-exposed lenses. The Alamar Blue assay data for SDS, BAK and UV-B-exposed lenses, except the 0.001% SDS treated lens group, showed also dose- and time-dependent decreases in cellular viability in comparison with the control lenses, and there was no cellular recovery during the entire culture period. Lenses treated with 0.001% SDS did not show biological damage until 8-days after exposure. It appears that cellular changes appeared earlier than optical changes.
Conclusions:
The findings suggest that cultured bovine lenses can be evaluated by assays that probe optical properties and cellular function after exposure to surfactants and UV-B irradiation, and that the optical and biological assay methods are valuable for in vitro mild ocular toxicity research.