Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 12, 2026

07:30
Homogeneous Time-resolved Förster Resonance Energy Transfer-based Assay for Detection of Insulin Secretion
Published on: May 10, 2018
Performance characteristics of six third-generation assays for thyroid-stimulating hormone
Mindy L Rawlins1, William L Roberts
1ARUP Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA.
Clinical Chemistry
|October 9, 2004
Summary
Thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) assays show significant variability, failing to provide comparable results for low concentrations. Harmonization efforts are needed to ensure accurate diagnosis of thyroid disorders.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Chemistry
- Endocrinology
- Assay Development
Background:
- Thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) assays are crucial for diagnosing hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism.
- Current guidelines mandate a functional sensitivity of ≤0.02 mIU/L for TSH assays.
- Assay validation involves analyzing serum samples across multiple reagent lots over several weeks.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the functional sensitivity of six automated TSH assay methods.
- To compare the performance of these TSH assays across different serum pools and concentrations.
Main Methods:
- Functional sensitivity was determined for Access 2, ADVIA Centaur, ARCHITECT i2000, E170, IMMULITE 2000, and Vitros ECi methods.
- Seven serum pools and two reagent lots per method were utilized for the analysis.
- Method-comparison studies were conducted using samples with TSH concentrations >0.2 mIU/L.
Main Results:
- Functional sensitivities varied, with ARCHITECT i2000 (<0.005 mIU/L) and Vitros ECi (0.004 mIU/L) showing the highest sensitivity.
- Significant differences in mean results were observed between methods, particularly for low TSH concentration pools.
- The ARCHITECT i2000 method demonstrated the highest precision at low TSH levels.
Conclusions:
- Current automated TSH assays exhibit significant variability, impacting comparability of results, especially at concentrations below 0.2 mIU/L.
- Discrepancies exist across the analytic measurement range, necessitating further investigation.
- Harmonization of TSH assay methods is essential for reliable clinical interpretation and patient diagnosis.

