Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Time intervals production in tapping and oscillatory motion.

Didier Delignières1, Loïc Lemoine, Kjerstin Torre

  • 1EA 2991 Motor Efficiency and Deficiency, Faculty of Sports and Physical Education, University Montpellier I, 700, Avenue du Pic Saint Loup, 34090, France. didier.delignieres@univ-montp1.fr

Human Movement Science
|October 12, 2004
PubMed
Summary

Movement timing differs based on the task. Finger tapping uses discrete event timing, while hand oscillations suggest continuous dynamic timing, highlighting movement

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Task-specific vs general measures of pain-related fear relative associations with spinal motor behaviour: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Pain·2025
Same author

Restoring the complexity of walking in the elderly and its impact on clinical measures around the risk of falls.

Frontiers in network physiology·2025
Same author

Complex systems approaches to the adaptability of human functions and behavior in health, aging, and chronic diseases: protocol for a meta-narrative review.

Systematic reviews·2023
Same author

Adaptive Capacities and Complexity of Heart Rate Variability in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Throughout Pulmonary Rehabilitation.

Frontiers in physiology·2021
Same author

Relationship between gait complexity and pain attention in chronic low back pain.

Pain·2021
Same author

Restoring Walking Complexity in Older Adults Through Arm-in-Arm Walking: Were Almurad et al.'s (2018) Results an Artifact?

Motor control·2021

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Motor Control
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Rhythmic movement tasks are crucial for understanding motor control and timing mechanisms.
  • Existing timing models, like the Wing-Kristoffersson model, primarily focus on discrete event-based timing.
  • The role of continuous movement dynamics in timing control remains less understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate and compare the timing mechanisms underlying discrete (finger tapping) and continuous (hand oscillation) movements.
  • To determine if spectral analysis can differentiate between event-based and dynamic timing processes.
  • To explore the potential of oscillatory movement characteristics as a resource for timing control.

Main Methods:

  • Conducted a synchronization-continuation experiment involving time interval production.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilized spectral analysis to analyze time series data from two conditions: finger tapping and oscillatory hand motion.
  • Compared results against established discrete, event-based timing models.

    • Main Results:

    • Finger tapping data aligned with a discrete, event-based timing model.
    • Oscillatory hand motion data revealed characteristics of a continuous, dynamic timing mechanism.
    • The continuous timing mechanism appeared to be regulated by effector stiffness.

    Conclusions:

    • Movement's oscillatory nature provides a significant resource for timing control.
    • Event-based timing models may be limited to specific rhythmic tasks involving discrete events.
    • Continuous dynamic timing mechanisms are relevant for tasks involving oscillatory movements.