Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Overdiagnosis in early detection programs.

Ori Davidov1, Marvin Zelen

  • 1Department of Statistics, University of Haifa, Mount Carmel, Haifa 31905, Israel. davidov@stat.haifa.ac.il

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)
|October 12, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Newborn readmissions and virtual primary care delivery: a population-based case-control study.

BMC primary care·2024
Same author

A novel performance scoring quantification framework for stress test set-ups.

PloS one·2023
Same author

On the use of historical estimates.

Statistical papers (Berlin, Germany)·2023
Same author

Testing for inequality constraints in singular models by trimming or winsorizing the variance matrix.

Journal of the American Statistical Association·2020
Same author

MULTI-CENTER CLINICAL TRIALS: RANDOMIZATION AND ANCILLARY STATISTICS.

The annals of applied statistics·2019
Same author

The Dana-Farber CISNET Model for Breast Cancer Screening Strategies: An Update.

Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making·2018
Same journal

A Bayesian functional concurrent zero-inflated Dirichlet-multinomial regression model with application to infant microbiome.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

Towards optimal environmental policies: policy learning under arbitrary bipartite network interference.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

Multilevel functional quantile principal component analysis.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

Adaptive transfer learning for time-to-event modeling with applications in disease risk assessment.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

High-dimensional test for one-sided hypotheses.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

NBSR: a Negative Binomial Softmax Regression model for microRNA-seq data analysis.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)·2026
See all related articles

Overdiagnosis, detected by screening, occurs when a disease is found that wouldn't have caused harm. This study reveals a remarkably high probability of overdiagnosis in early detection programs, particularly for prostate cancer.

Area of Science:

  • Medical screening
  • Biostatistics
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Overdiagnosis is the detection of a disease that would not have become clinically apparent during a person's lifetime.
  • The probability of overdiagnosis is a critical, yet understudied, metric for evaluating early detection programs.
  • Individuals may die from other causes before a subclinical disease manifests.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To rigorously study and quantify the probability of overdiagnosis in idealized early detection programs.
  • To derive a mathematical expression for the probability of overdiagnosis.
  • To apply these findings to prostate cancer screening schedules.

Main Methods:

  • Mathematical modeling of an idealized early detection program.
  • Derivation of a formula for the probability of overdiagnosis.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Numerical analysis of the derived expression for prostate cancer.
  • Main Results:

    • A mathematical expression for the probability of overdiagnosis was derived.
    • Numerical simulations for prostate cancer screening were performed.
    • The probability of overdiagnosis was found to be remarkably high across various screening schedules.

    Conclusions:

    • The probability of overdiagnosis is a significant factor in the evaluation of early detection strategies.
    • Findings suggest that overdiagnosis is a substantial issue in current screening paradigms.
    • Further research is warranted to address the implications of high overdiagnosis rates.