Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Comparing the power of quality-control rules to detect persistent increases in random error.

C A Parvin1

  • 1Department of Pathology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110.

Clinical Chemistry
|March 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary

This study evaluates quality-control rules for detecting imprecision in laboratory testing. Computer simulations reveal that a new F-test rule performs poorly, highlighting limitations in current statistical evaluation methods.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Hypoxia reduces expression and function of system A amino acid transporters in cultured term human trophoblasts.

American journal of physiology. Cell physiology·2002
Same author

Inhibition of sorbitol dehydrogenase exacerbates autonomic neuropathy in rats with streptozotocin-induced diabetes.

Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology·2002
Same author

Falsely increased i-STAT chloride results for blood samples with increased urea.

Clinical chemistry·2001
Same author

Evaluation of the TAS analyzer and the low-range heparin management test in patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Clinical chemistry·2001
Same author

Correction of positive bias of the Roche Tina-quant II hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) assay at low HbA1c percentages.

Clinical chemistry·2001
Same author

Effect of NGF and neurotrophin-3 treatment on experimental diabetic autonomic neuropathy.

Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology·2001
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Chemistry
  • Biostatistics
  • Laboratory Quality Management

Background:

  • Statistical evaluation of quality-control (QC) rules is crucial for laboratory accuracy.
  • Traditional methods face challenges in assessing QC rule performance under varying error conditions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate an alternative statistical approach for evaluating QC rules.
  • To compare the performance of different QC rules in detecting increases in within-run and between-run imprecision.

Main Methods:

  • Computer simulations were employed to model and assess QC rule performance.
  • Evaluation focused on the impact of out-of-control conditions on total analytical imprecision.
  • Performance was analyzed based on the relative contributions of between-run and within-run error components.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The error detection ability of a QC rule is contingent upon the relative magnitudes of between-run and within-run errors.
  • A recently proposed F-test based rule demonstrated suboptimal performance in detecting between-run imprecision.
  • The study identified limitations in traditional evaluation approaches for certain QC scenarios.

Conclusions:

  • The effectiveness of QC rules is influenced by the interplay of different error sources.
  • The F-test rule shows limitations, suggesting a need for improved statistical methods in laboratory quality control.
  • Alternative evaluation approaches may offer better insights into QC rule performance.