Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 21, 2026
A Common Marmoset Model of Mother-Infant Intervention for Breastfeeding Disorders in the Presence of Paternal Inhibition and Maternal Neglect
Published on: September 22, 2023
A new formula for calculating weight in the fetus of < or = 1600 g
R L Schild1, K Fell, R Fimmers
1Department of Obstetrics and Fetal Medicine, Centre for Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Germany. ralf.schild@gyn.imed.uni-erlangen.de
Objective:
To develop and test a new formula for estimating weight in the fetus of < or = 1600 g.
Methods:
A formula for sonographic estimation of fetal weight was produced retrospectively from 84 singleton fetuses with a birth weight of < or = 1600 g, examined sonographically within 1 week before delivery. Exclusion criteria were multiple pregnancy, intrauterine death and major structural or chromosomal anomalies. The new formula was then compared prospectively in an evaluation group of fetuses (n = 87) with six currently available equations for estimating weight in the preterm fetus.
Results:
Stepwise regression analysis with gestational age (in days) and fetal biometric parameters was employed to yield the best-fit formula for predicting fetal weight at birth. The new formula (estimated fetal weight = 5381.193 + 150.324 x head circumference + 2.069 x femur length3 + 0.0232 x abdominal circumference3-6235.478 x log(head circumference)) proved to be superior to established equations. The lowest mean +/- SD absolute error was 66.2 +/- 59 g and the lowest mean absolute percentage error was 7.1 +/- 5.9% SD when studied prospectively in the evaluation group. With the new formula, 48.3% of estimates fell within +/-5% of the actual weight at birth, 73.6% fell within +/-10%, 90.8% fell within +/-15% and 95.4% fell within +/-20%.
Conclusion:
Our new formula is relatively easy to use and needs no adjustment to weight centiles or to fetal lie. It allows reliable weight estimation in the fetus < or = 1600 g.
Related Concept Videos
01:21Rigid Body Equilibrium Problems - II
Consider two children sitting on a seesaw, which has negligible mass. The first child has a mass (m1) of 26 kg and sits at point A, which is 1.6 meters (r1) from the pivot point B; the second child has a mass (m2) of 32 kg and sits at point C. How far from the pivot point B should the second child sit (r2) to balance the seesaw?
01:20Variation in Acceleration due to Gravity near the Earth's Surface
The difference between the true and apparent weights is proportional to the square of the Earth's angular speed. Since the...
01:27Gravity between Spherical Bodies
This assumption can be proved easily by showing that the expression for gravitational potential energy between a hollow sphere of mass (M) and a point mass (m) is the same as it would be for a pair of extended...
01:12Measuring Acceleration Due to Gravity
A simple pendulum can be described as a point mass and a string. Meanwhile, a physical pendulum is any object whose oscillations are similar to a simple pendulum, but cannot be modeled as a point mass on a string because its mass is distributed over a larger area. The behavior of a physical pendulum can be modeled using the principles of...