Ethical considerations on kidney transplantation from living donors

Our study population consisted of 402 Living Related Donors (LRD)--of which 344 pairs shared 1 haplotype (Group A) and of 209 Living Unrelated Donors (LURD) (Group B): 175 between spouse pairs (Group C)--132 from wife to husband (Group C1) and 43 from husband to wife (Group C2) as well as 32 between relatives in law or emotionally related patients and 2 between members of clergy (Group D). 199 pairs showed 3-6 HLA A B Dr mismatches (MM) with the donor and in 10 cases 0-2 MM. Donor and recipient mean age was 49 +/- 13.4 and 29 +/- 10.3 in Group A and respectively 46 +/- 11.2 and 48 +/- 9.6 in Group B. The post-transplant immunosuppression therapy was based on Cyclosporin A (CsA). Chi2 test was used to assess statistical significance. Donor mortality was 0%; perioperative morbidity was 15.2%. Graft function immediately started after surgery. The actuarial 1 yr, 5 yrs, 10 yrs and 15 yrs graft survival was in Group A: 94%, 86%, 84%, 75% vs. Group B: 89%, 78%, 71%, 70% (NS), Group C1: 90%, 75%, 67%, 69% vs. Group C2: 81%, 74%, 72%, 62% (NS) and Group C: 88%, 78%, 66%, 60% vs. Group D: 91%, 80%, 71%, 61% (NS). There was no statistically significant difference between LURD and LRD as far as graft survival. In conclusion, we certainly agree with the guidelines issued by the International Congress on Ethics in Organ Transplantation (Munich, December 10-13,2002): kidney transplantation from living donors is a safe and effective procedure and should not be discouraged.