Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 21, 2026

Advanced Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Modeling in Mice by Combination of Topical Elastase and Oral ß-aminopropionitrile
Published on: July 26, 2024
Diagnosis and follow up of aortitis in the elderly
A K Scheel1, J Meller, R Vosshenrich
1Department of Medicine, Georg-August-University Göttingen, D-37075 Göttingen, Germany. ascheel@gwdg.de
Objectives:
To evaluate the correlation of MRI and [(18)F]FDG-PET scans with the clinical course and inflammatory markers in patients with aortitis.
Methods:
Eight patients with aortitis presenting with unspecific GCA-like symptoms were examined. Aortitis was diagnosed and followed up by [(18)F]FDG-PET and MRI. The aorta was divided into three vascular regions (ascending aorta, aortic arch, and descending aorta) to localise the aortic inflammation and compare both imaging techniques.
Results:
were correlated with clinical and laboratory examinations.
Results:
At diagnosis, 20/24 vascular regions from eight patients were positive by [(18)F]FDG-PET scan and 15/21 aortic regions by MRI. Patients were treated with corticosteroids and followed up for a mean (SD) of 13.3 (4.7) months. In [(18)F]FDG-PET, 11/20 (55%) initially pathological aortic regions returned to normal in the follow up examination, which correlated closely with the clinical and laboratory follow up examination. Conversely, in MRI, 14/15 initially affected vascular regions were unchanged.
Conclusions:
[(18)F]FDG-PET and MRI are both effective techniques for detecting early aortitis and have a high correlation with laboratory inflammatory measures. However, during the follow up examination, [(18)F]FDG-PET uptake decreased in line with the clinical symptoms and inflammatory serum markers, whereas MRI scans gave more static results.
Insights
[(18)F]FDG-PET scans show decreasing inflammation in aortitis patients, correlating with clinical markers. MRI scans, while effective for initial detection, offer more static results during follow-up.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Imaging
- Nuclear Medicine
- Radiology
Background:
- Aortitis, a serious inflammatory condition affecting the aorta, requires accurate diagnostic and monitoring tools.
- Giant cell arteritis (GCA)-like symptoms can present unspecifically, complicating diagnosis.
- Distinguishing active inflammation from chronic changes is crucial for effective treatment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography ([(18)F]FDG-PET) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in evaluating aortitis.
- To assess the correlation between imaging findings and clinical disease activity and inflammatory markers.
- To determine the utility of these modalities in monitoring treatment response over time.
Main Methods:
- Eight patients with suspected aortitis underwent both [(18)F]FDG-PET and MRI.
- The aorta was segmented into three regions for localized inflammation assessment.
- Patients were followed clinically and with laboratory tests during corticosteroid treatment.
Main Results:
- [(18)F]FDG-PET detected inflammation in 20/24 regions, while MRI identified it in 15/21 regions at diagnosis.
- Follow-up [(18)F]FDG-PET showed normalization in 55% of initially affected regions, closely mirroring clinical and laboratory improvements.
- In contrast, MRI revealed persistent abnormalities in 14/15 initially affected regions, showing limited change.
Conclusions:
- Both [(18)F]FDG-PET and MRI are valuable for initial aortitis detection and correlate with inflammatory markers.
- [(18)F]FDG-PET is superior for monitoring treatment response, as decreased uptake reflects clinical and serological improvements.
- MRI provides a more static view, making it less sensitive for assessing dynamic changes in inflammation during follow-up.
Related Concept Videos
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Endocarditis III: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation IV: Nursing Management