Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Digital detectors for mammography: the technical challenges.

A Noel1, F Thibault

  • 1Centre Alexis Vautrin, Unité de Radiophysique Médicale, Paris, France.

European Radiology
|October 14, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Opportunities, challenges, and difficulties in NMR-based metabolomics applied to neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) patient follow-up.

Frontiers in molecular biosciences·2025
Same author

High-precision cavity-enhanced spectroscopy for studying the H<sub>2</sub>-Ar collisions and interactions.

The Journal of chemical physics·2023
Same author

Pure rotational R(0) and R(1) lines of CO in Ar baths: experimental broadening, shifting and mixing parameters in a wide pressure range <i>versus ab initio</i> calculations.

Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP·2022
Same author

ASSESSMENT OF OVERRANGING AS A FUNCTION OF PITCH, COLLIMATION AND ROTATION TIME FOR THREE OF THE MOST RECENT AND WIDESPREAD CT SCANS IN FRANCE.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2022
Same author

Single and combined impacts of irradiation and surgery on lymphatic vasculature and fibrosis associated to secondary lymphedema.

Frontiers in pharmacology·2022
Same author

[Inflammation and cancer : a complex two-way relationship].

Revue medicale de Liege·2022
Same journal

The bMRI-QUAL scoring system: an important first step toward standardizing breast MRI quality.

European radiology·2026
Same journal

Spectral CT-based habitat analysis for predicting pathologic response to neoadjuvant therapy in gastric cancer.

European radiology·2026
Same journal

MR-guided microwave ablation of liver tumors: outcomes in local tumor control and determinants of treatment success.

European radiology·2026
Same journal

AI integration in pediatric radiology: perspectives from international academic leaders.

European radiology·2026
Same journal

Association of hypertension and blood pressure control with aneurysm wall enhancement in unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a multicenter propensity score-matched study.

European radiology·2026
Same journal

Conservative management of < 3cm anterior mediastinal lesions in lung cancer screening is safe.

European radiology·2026
See all related articles

This review explores full-field digital mammography techniques, detailing detector principles and performance metrics like spatial resolution and detective quantum efficiency for optimal breast imaging. It highlights technology trade-offs influencing image quality.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology and Medical Imaging
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Full-field digital mammography (FFDM) has largely replaced film-screen mammography.
  • Various FFDM technologies are available, each with distinct characteristics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and compare competing techniques for full-field digital mammography.
  • To explain the principles of different detector types and their performance parameters.

Main Methods:

  • Review of available literature on FFDM detector technologies.
  • Description of detector principles: photostimulable storage phosphor plates, active matrix detectors (flat-panel, thin-film transistor-based), and scanning systems.
  • Explanation of key performance parameters: spatial resolution, detective quantum efficiency (DQE), and modulation transfer function (MTF).

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Detailed explanation of three main detector categories: storage phosphor plates, active matrix detectors, and scanning systems.
  • Discussion of indirect and direct X-ray conversion methods.
  • Identification of critical performance parameters influencing digital mammography image quality.

Conclusions:

  • The performance of FFDM systems is a result of technological compromises.
  • Understanding detector principles and performance metrics is crucial for selecting optimal FFDM technology.
  • Continued advancements in FFDM aim to balance resolution, efficiency, and cost for improved breast cancer detection.