Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Setting priorities for research.

Rachael L Fleurence1, David J Torgerson

  • 1Department of Health Sciences, Seebohm-Rowntree Building, Area 4, University of York, York YO10 5DQ, UK. rfleurence@yahoo.co.uk

Health Policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
|October 16, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

SPIRIT 2025 statement: updated guideline for protocols of randomised trials.

Lancet (London, England)·2026
Same author

Correction: Predictive value of BMD for hip and other fractures: a meta-analysis to update FRAX.

Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA·2026
Same author

Challenges and solutions to the implementation of studies within a trial: The experiences of the PROMETHEUS programme.

Research methods in medicine & health sciences·2026
Same author

Correction: A meta-analysis of previous falls and subsequent fracture risk in cohort studies.

Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA·2026
Same author

Predictive value of BMD for hip and other fractures: a meta-analysis to update FRAX.

Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA·2026
Same author

A meta-analysis of smoking and fracture risk to update the FRAX® tool.

Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA·2026
Same journal

A policy analysis of the three-month waiting period for new and returning residents to access provincial health insurance in Ontario, Canada.

Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2026
Same journal

Policy priorities in palliative and end-of-life care: An exploration of issues reflected in public strategy.

Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2026
Same journal

Advancing stakeholder analysis: Power and participation in health technology assessment policy development in the United Arab Emirates.

Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2026
Same journal

Cultural sensitivity concerning the Gaeltacht people of Ireland - a concept analysis.

Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2026
Same journal

Israel's 2010 capitation reform and the widening of regional health disparities: A difference-in-differences analysis.

Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2026
Same journal

Does implementing strengths-based approaches improve adult social care outcomes in England? An econometric analysis of the Care Act 2014.

Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2026
See all related articles

Effective research priority setting is crucial for maximizing scarce resources. The value of information method aligns research valuation with health system objectives, though implementation requires further study.

Area of Science:

  • Health economics
  • Research policy
  • Decision science

Background:

  • Efficient resource allocation in research is vital but adoption of priority-setting methods is slow.
  • Existing methodologies often fail to align with health system objectives of maximizing health benefits within budget constraints and equity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate different methods for valuing research and setting priorities.
  • To identify a methodology that aligns research valuation with health system objectives.

Main Methods:

  • Review of five practical approaches to valuing research and setting priorities.
  • Comparative analysis of subjective methods, burden of disease, clinical variations, payback methods, and value of information.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Subjective, burden of disease, clinical variations, and payback methods have shortcomings in meeting health system objectives.
  • The value of information method, utilizing a cost-effectiveness framework, aligns research valuation with service provision decisions.

Conclusions:

  • The value of information method offers a promising approach for research priority setting aligned with health system goals.
  • Further research is needed to optimize the communication and implementation of research outcomes derived from this method.