Related Experiment Videos
Adolescent personality: a five-factor model construct validation.
Spencer R Baker1, James B Victor, Anthony L Chambers
1Behavioral Science Research Center, Hampton University, Hampton, VA 23668, USA. spencer.baker@hamptonu.edu.
Assessment
|October 16, 2004
Summary
This study validates the five-factor model of adolescent personality using self, peer, and teacher ratings. While generally supported, self-ratings were less reliable for assessing adolescent personality traits.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Developmental Psychology
- Personality Psychology
Background:
- The five-factor model (FFM) is a widely accepted framework for understanding adult personality.
- Its applicability and validity in adolescent populations require further investigation, particularly across different rating sources.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine the convergent and discriminant validity of the FFM of adolescent personality.
- To compare the utility of self-ratings, peer ratings, and teacher ratings in assessing adolescent personality within a school context.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a multitrait-multimethod matrix analysis.
- Employed confirmatory factor analysis with a correlated trait, uncorrelated method model.
- Collected data from adolescents using self-ratings, peer ratings, and teacher ratings.
Main Results:
- The FFM structure demonstrated good convergent and discriminant validity across self, peer, and teacher ratings for most personality factors.
- Emotional Stability showed weaker validity evidence compared to other factors.
- Self-ratings emerged as a comparatively weaker method for assessing adolescent personality traits.
Conclusions:
- The findings provide support for the validity of the five-factor model of adolescent personality in a school setting.
- Acknowledges the differential utility of various rating methods, highlighting limitations of self-report.
- Discusses factors influencing inter-rater agreement, including social context and rater characteristics.