Related Experiment Videos
Application of systematic review methods to qualitative research: practical issues
1School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, South Yorkshire, UK. m.lloydjones@sheffield.ac.uk
Journal of Advanced Nursing
|October 19, 2004
Summary
Systematic reviews and meta-syntheses of qualitative health services research are demanding but rewarding. Careful planning and adequate resources are essential for effectively integrating qualitative findings.
Area of Science:
- Health Services Research
- Qualitative Research Methodology
- Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis
Background:
- Increasing volume of qualitative research necessitates methods for integration.
- Limited established methodologies for systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.
- Practical challenges in applying systematic review techniques to qualitative data.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore practical methodological issues in applying systematic review and meta-synthesis to qualitative health services research.
- To address the pragmatic research question on factors influencing advanced nursing roles in acute care settings.
Main Methods:
- Conducted a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.
- Focused on studies relevant to role development and practice of advanced nurses in acute hospitals.
- Investigated factors facilitating or impeding advanced nursing roles.
Main Results:
- Study identification and retrieval are more time-consuming than for quantitative reviews.
- Appraisal and data analysis are iterative and demand more time.
- Utilizing full project reports may mitigate reviewer-participant distance issues.
Conclusions:
- Systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative research is feasible but resource-intensive.
- Adequate time and resources are crucial for successful execution.
- Recommendations are provided to facilitate these complex processes.