Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 21, 2026
![Chemical-Induced Skin Carcinogenesis Model Using Dimethylbenz[a]Anthracene and 12-O-Tetradecanoyl Phorbol-13-Acetate (DMBA-TPA)](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcloudfront.jove.com%2FCDNSource%2Fteasers%2F60445.jpg&w=3840&q=50)
Chemical-Induced Skin Carcinogenesis Model Using Dimethylbenz[a]Anthracene and 12-O-Tetradecanoyl Phorbol-13-Acetate (DMBA-TPA)
Published on: December 19, 2019
Multistep and multifactorial carcinogenesis: when does a contributing factor become a carcinogen?
Michele Carbone1, Harvey I Pass
1Department of Pathology, Cardinal Bernardin Cancer Center, Loyola University Chicago, Room 250, 2160 South First Ave, Maywood, IL 60302, USA. mcarbon@lumc.edu
Abstract:
Our greatest successes in fighting cancer derive from the identification and removal or inactivation of carcinogenic substances, and from the identification and removal of pre-malignant lesions. In comparison, our successes at treating already formed malignancies have been minimal. Therefore, emphasis should be put in identifying and removing pre-malignant lesions, and in the identification and removal of those agents that cause or contribute to cancer development. It is important to target initiators, co-carcinogens and promoters, since by removing any one of them, tumor growth may be prevented. Identification of these agents is difficult. Epidemiological studies largely study cancer after it has occurred. It would be preferable to identify potential carcinogenic substances at an earlier stage before they have caused a large number of malignancies and thus become identifiable by epidemiology. During the past three decades, we have accumulated an impressive amount of evidence concerning molecular pathways that when altered contribute to malignant growth. It is time that we start applying this knowledge to the identification of human carcinogens. Here, we review the molecular changes that are required for carcinogenesis and propose some criteria that, in the absence of epidemiological evidence, can be used to identify agents that cause or contribute to human cancer development. In the absence of epidemiological evidence, a given agent should be considered a human carcinogen when: (1) the agent causes or contributes to the development of tumors in animals that are of the same type as those tumors associated with exposure to the agent in humans; (2) the agent transforms or contributes to the transformation of human cells in culture and these cells are of the same type from which associated human malignancies arise; (3) there is molecular evidence that the agent interferes with one or more key molecular pathways in human cells which leads to the formation of human cancer.
Insights
Identifying cancer-causing agents early is crucial for prevention. This study proposes molecular criteria to identify human carcinogens before widespread disease occurs, aiding proactive cancer control.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Molecular Biology
- Carcinogenesis Research
Background:
- Cancer treatment successes are limited compared to prevention via removing carcinogens and pre-malignant lesions.
- Current epidemiological studies identify carcinogens only after significant cancer development.
- Understanding molecular pathways of cancer is key to early carcinogen identification.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review molecular changes required for carcinogenesis.
- To propose criteria for identifying human carcinogens in the absence of epidemiological data.
- To shift focus towards early detection and removal of cancer-initiating agents.
Main Methods:
- Review of molecular pathways involved in cancer development.
- Proposal of criteria for identifying carcinogens based on animal studies, cell transformation, and molecular evidence.
- Analysis of molecular interference with key pathways in human cells.
Main Results:
- Established criteria for identifying human carcinogens without epidemiological evidence.
- Criteria include: (1) tumor development in animals, (2) human cell transformation, and (3) molecular pathway interference.
- Highlights the importance of targeting initiators, co-carcinogens, and promoters.
Conclusions:
- Early identification and removal of carcinogens are more effective than treating established malignancies.
- Proposed molecular criteria can identify potential human carcinogens proactively.
- Applying molecular knowledge to carcinogen identification is essential for cancer prevention.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity
Cancer Prevention
Some...
Cancers Originate from Somatic Mutations in a Single Cell
Skin Cancer
Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC): BCC is the most common type of skin cancer, accounting for about 80% of cases. It typically develops in...
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
Mutations

