Vascular access stenosis: comparison of arteriovenous grafts and fistulas

Ivan D Maya1, Rachel Oser, Souheil Saddekni

  • 1Division of Nephrology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.

Insights

Vascular access stenosis is common in hemodialysis patients, but angioplasty outcomes are similar for arteriovenous fistulas and grafts. Female sex, residual stenosis, and high postprocedure pressure predict shorter access patency.

Area of Science:

  • Nephrology
  • Vascular Surgery
  • Interventional Radiology

Background:

  • Vascular access stenosis is a common complication for hemodialysis patients.
  • Limited literature compares stenosis features and angioplasty outcomes between arteriovenous fistulas and grafts.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare stenosis characteristics and angioplasty outcomes in hemodialysis patients with arteriovenous fistulas versus grafts.
  • To identify clinical factors predicting access patency after angioplasty.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective data collection for patients undergoing fistulogram for suspected access stenosis over two years.
  • Angioplasty performed for >50% stenosis; recording lesion characteristics and pressure ratios.
  • Multivariable analysis to assess factors influencing intervention-free access survival.

Main Results:

  • Fistulas had significantly lower rates of significant stenosis (39.4%) compared to grafts (68.7%).
  • Among stenotic accesses, fistulas were less likely to have multiple lesions.
  • Technical success and intervention-free survival were similar between fistulas and grafts post-angioplasty.

Conclusions:

  • Clinical evaluation for stenosis has lower predictive value for fistulas than grafts.
  • Angioplasty technical success and primary patency are comparable for both access types.
  • Female sex, residual stenosis, and high postprocedure access pressure ratio predict reduced access patency.
Abstract