Experience with RAST-based immunotherapy

During its 80 year history, allergen immunotherapy has been used essentially as Noon and other early investigators described it. Immunotherapy is practiced mainly as an art based on uncontrolled clinical observations of individual patients treated in private practice. Dosing schedules and skin test interpretations are based primarily on the biases of the treating physicians. In an effort to improve the results obtained from immunotherapy, different approaches have evolved. Serial dilution skin endpoint titration (SET), practiced mostly by otolaryngologists, became popularized in the 1960s out of the need to optimize immunotherapy dosing regimens. SET can be viewed as a forward step in the direction of more aggressive yet safe initial immunotherapy doses. With the discovery of IgE in 1966 as the prime carrier of reaginic hypersensitivity in humans came the availability of a remarkable set of in vitro assays for the measurement of total and allergen-specific IgE reactivity. The radioallergosorbent test (RAST), which has been shown to correlate reliably with the major variants of the atopic state, was modified in 1977 in such a way as to enhance the sensitivity of the assay with minimal alteration of specificity. The modified RAST (MRT) has been carefully investigated and has shown reliable concordance with the major parameters of clinical allergy. Since its development only 14 years ago, the MRT has become a dependable adjunct for the determination of initial and in many cases final immunotherapy doses. An important contribution of RAST-based immunotherapy is that only patients with quantifiable serum titers of allergen-specific IgE qualify as candidates for immunotherapy. The fact that fewer allergens are used for treatment at higher initial doses and that potential reactors are identified before starting therapy are yet other advantages of RAST-based immunotherapy. The use of RAST as a method of allergen standardization only reinforces its value in patient management.