Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Visual search for simple volumetric shapes.

J M Brown1, N Weisstein, J G May

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens 30602.

Perception & Psychophysics
|January 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Stationary phantoms and grating induction with oblique inducing gratings: implications for different mechanisms underlying the two phenomena.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2001
Same author

Saccadic latency during perceptual processing and sequence learning.

Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology·2000
Same author

Afterimages, grating induction and illusory phantoms.

Vision research·2000
Same author

Change in the mode of inhibition of acetylcholinesterase by (4-nitrophenyl)sulfonoxyl derivatives of conformationally constrained choline analogues.

Chemical research in toxicology·1998
Same author

On a failure to replicate: methodologically close, but not close enough. A response to hogben et al.

Vision research·1996
Same author

The effectiveness of a motion sickness counselling programme.

The British journal of clinical psychology·1995
Same journal

Response organization in selective adaptation to speech sounds.

Perception & psychophysics·2014
Same journal

Reaction times to comparisons within and across phonetic categories.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Simple and contingent adaptation effects for place of articulation in stop consonants.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Auditory property detectors and processing place features in stop consonants.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Visual working memory for line orientations and face identities.

Perception & psychophysics·2008
See all related articles

Visual search for simple 3-D shapes is not preattentive. Reaction time (RT) depended on distractor number and orientation, suggesting shapes are processed serially unless they have a curved principal axis.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Visual Perception
  • Human Factors

Background:

  • Visual search performance is influenced by object features and display complexity.
  • Preattentive processing allows for rapid, effortless target detection.
  • Understanding how three-dimensional (3-D) shape and orientation affect visual search is crucial for human-computer interaction and design.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether simple volumetric shapes are processed preattentively during visual search.
  • To examine the effects of distractor number, shape, and 3-D orientation on reaction time (RT).
  • To identify conditions under which visual search for 3-D shapes exhibits pop-out or serial processing.

Main Methods:

  • Five experiments were conducted, measuring RT to detect target shapes among distractors.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Stimuli included simple volumetric shapes in various 2-D and 3-D orientations.
  • Pairwise combinations of shapes and mixed-orientation distractors were systematically varied.
  • Main Results:

    • Pop-out effects were predictable by differences in two-dimensional (2-D) features.
    • Slower search times supported previously found search asymmetries for specific 2-D features.
    • Search became serial when distractors were a mixture of shapes in the same 3-D orientation, except for targets with a curved principal axis.

    Conclusions:

    • Simple volumetric shapes are not processed preattentively.
    • Visual search for these shapes relies on serial processing, influenced by feature differences and orientation.
    • The findings contribute to understanding the limits of preattentive visual processing for complex stimuli.