Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Optional processes in similarity judgments.

R D Melara1, L E Marks, K E Lesko

  • 1Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana.

Perception & Psychophysics
|February 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The perplexing plurality of psychophysical processes.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2014
Same author

How important are dimensions to perception?

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2014
Same author

Anxiety sensitivity and auditory perception of heartbeat.

Behaviour research and therapy·2006
Same author

Valid across-group comparisons with labeled scales: the gLMS versus magnitude matching.

Physiology & behavior·2004
Same author

Informational primacy of visual dimensions: specialized roles for luminance and chromaticity in figure-ground perception.

Perception & psychophysics·2001
Same author

A confluence of contexts: asymmetric versus global failures of selective attention to stroop dimensions.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2001
Same journal

Response organization in selective adaptation to speech sounds.

Perception & psychophysics·2014
Same journal

Reaction times to comparisons within and across phonetic categories.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Simple and contingent adaptation effects for place of articulation in stop consonants.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Auditory property detectors and processing place features in stop consonants.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Visual working memory for line orientations and face identities.

Perception & psychophysics·2008
See all related articles

Similarity judgments involve both mandatory and optional cognitive processes. Optional processing, influenced by task instructions, can mask underlying mandatory processes in perception.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Perceptual Science
  • Psychophysics

Background:

  • Understanding how different sensory dimensions interact in similarity judgments is crucial for cognitive science.
  • Previous research has explored dimensional interactions, but the interplay between obligatory and voluntary processing remains unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the rules governing information combination across integral (pitch/loudness), configural (parentheses), and cross-modal (visual position/auditory pitch) dimensions.
  • To determine whether mandatory cognitive processes in similarity judgments can be influenced or obscured by optional processing strategies.

Main Methods:

  • Participants judged similarity across three pairs of interacting dimensions.
  • Experimental manipulation of instructions varied focus between overall stimulus properties and individual dimensions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Similarity scaling rules (Euclidean vs. city-block) were analyzed based on instructional conditions.

    • Main Results:

    • Evidence supports the commingling of mandatory and optional processing in similarity judgments.
    • Instructions to rate overall similarity promoted a holistic, Euclidean similarity rule.
    • Instructions to focus on specific dimensions led to a dimensional, city-block similarity rule, indicating optional processing.

    Conclusions:

    • Optional cognitive processes, guided by task instructions, significantly influence similarity judgments.
    • These optional processes can mask or obscure the underlying mandatory processes that govern dimensional interactions.
    • Further research is needed to isolate and understand mandatory processes by accounting for the effects of optional processing.