Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis.

S Sauerland1, R Lefering, E A M Neugebauer

  • 1Biochemical & Experimental Division, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, Cologne, Germany, 51109.

The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
|October 21, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Rapid sequence versus early surgical stabilization of severe chest wall injuries: a propensity score-matched analysis from a multicenter trauma registry.

Critical care (London, England)·2026
Same author

Validation of the 2022 German trauma team activation criteria: a national registry study with focus on geriatric-specific modifiers.

Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine·2026
Same author

Preventing the disaster: severe abdominal injury in child passengers of motor vehicle accidents often indicate even more serious trauma.

European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society·2025
Same author

Trends in pre-hospital volume resuscitation of blunt trauma patients: a 15-year analysis of the British (TARN) and German (TraumaRegister DGU®) National Registries.

Critical care (London, England)·2024
Same author

Imposter or knight in shining armor? Pelvic circumferential compression devices (PCCD) for severe pelvic injuries in patients with multiple trauma: a trauma-registry analysis.

Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine·2024
Same author

How to evaluate scar colour after burn injuries - A clinical comparison of the Mexameter® and the subjective scar assessment (POSAS/VSS).

Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries·2023
Same journal

Interventions to prevent or cease electronic cigarette use in children and adolescents.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews·2026
Same journal

Drugs to improve anaemia, quality of life, and physical function in people with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS).

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews·2026
Same journal

Interventions for smoking cessation in inpatient psychiatry settings.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews·2026
Same journal

Mechanical thromboprophylaxis for preventing intradialytic hypotension in people undergoing maintenance haemodialysis.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews·2026
Same journal

Prognostic models for predicting intensive care unit admission or mortality in critically ill adults not yet been admitted to the intensive care unit.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews·2026
Same journal

Views and experiences of weight management for people living with mobility‑limiting conditions, intellectual disabilities or severe mental illness: a qualitative evidence synthesis.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews·2026
See all related articles

Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) offers benefits like fewer wound infections and faster recovery compared to open appendectomy (OA). However, it has a slightly longer surgery time and increased risk of intra-abdominal abscesses.

Area of Science:

  • Surgical Innovation
  • Minimally Invasive Procedures
  • Gastrointestinal Surgery

Background:

  • Laparoscopic surgery is increasingly proposed as a superior alternative to conventional open surgery for acute appendicitis.
  • Understanding the comparative benefits and risks is crucial for clinical decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically compare the diagnostic and therapeutic outcomes of laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) versus conventional open appendectomy (OA).
  • To evaluate the impact of diagnostic laparoscopy in reducing negative appendectomy rates.

Main Methods:

  • A comprehensive literature search was conducted across major databases (Cochrane, MEDLINE, EMBASE) and congress proceedings.
  • Randomized clinical trials comparing LA and OA in adults and children were included.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Data were analyzed using odds ratios and relative risks with 95% confidence intervals.

    • Main Results:

    • Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) was associated with significantly fewer wound infections but a higher incidence of intra-abdominal abscesses compared to open appendectomy (OA).
    • LA resulted in reduced postoperative pain, shorter hospital stays, and earlier return to normal activities.
    • Diagnostic laparoscopy effectively reduced negative appendectomy rates, particularly in women of childbearing age.

    Conclusions:

    • Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) and diagnostic laparoscopy offer advantages in settings with available expertise and equipment, despite some effects being minor.
    • The available evidence, though of mediocre quality, supports the use of laparoscopy for suspected appendicitis when feasible.
    • Specific patient groups, including young females, obese individuals, and employed patients, appear to benefit most from LA.