Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Working with human research protections.

Patricia H Arford1

  • 1College of Nursing, Medical University of South Carolina, PO Box 250160, Charleston, SC 29425, USA. arfordp@musc.edu

Journal of Nursing Scholarship : an Official Publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing
|October 22, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Competent human research personnel.

Journal of continuing education in nursing·2008
Same author

Organizational commitment to professional practice models.

The Journal of nursing administration·2005
Same author

Nurse-physician communication: an organizational accountability.

Nursing economic$·2005
See all related articles

This primer guides new nurse scientists through the complex human research environment. Understanding institutional review boards (IRBs) ensures ethical practices and regulatory compliance in research.

Area of Science:

  • Nursing Science
  • Human Research Ethics
  • Regulatory Affairs

Background:

  • Human research is governed by stringent federal regulations and international guidelines.
  • Protection of human research participants is a critical ethical and legal consideration.
  • Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) play a central role in overseeing human research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To educate novice nurse scientists on the evolving regulatory landscape of human research.
  • To provide a foundational understanding of ethical considerations in participant protection.
  • To clarify the function and importance of IRBs in research oversight.

Main Methods:

  • Review of federal regulations pertaining to human subjects research.
  • Analysis of international guidelines for ethical research conduct.
Keywords:
Biomedical and Behavioral Research

Related Experiment Videos

  • Explanation of the structure and review processes of Institutional Review Boards.

    • Main Results:

    • Novice nurse scientists require clear guidance on navigating research regulations.
    • IRB processes are essential for ensuring ethical research and participant safety.
    • Familiarity with regulatory requirements facilitates compliant and effective research.

    Conclusions:

    • Understanding IRB processes is key for novice nurse scientists.
    • Ethical human research is fostered through collaborative interactions and regulatory adherence.
    • Compliance with human research regulations supports the integrity and success of scientific endeavors.