Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 21, 2026

Quantification of the Immunosuppressant Tacrolimus on Dried Blood Spots Using LC-MS/MS
Published on: November 8, 2015
Mycophenolate mofetil vs azathioprine in a large population of elderly renal transplant patients
Herwig-Ulf Meier-Kriesche1, Jonathan A Morris, Alice H Chu
1Division of Internal Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA. meierhu@medicine.ufl.edu
Background:
Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has been shown to decrease acute rejection episodes after kidney transplantation, and has been associated with better graft and patient survival vs azathioprine (AZA). Previous studies reported a higher risk of death due to infection in elderly recipients treated with MMF-based immunosuppression.
Methods:
We analysed 5069 elderly ( > 65 years of age) primary renal allograft recipients treated with either MMF or AZA reported to the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients between 1988 and 2000, and compared rates of acute rejection, late acute rejection, graft survival, death-censored graft survival, patient survival and death with a functioning graft.
Results:
In Cox proportional hazard models, MMF was associated with lower rates of late acute rejection with 12 (RR = 0.72, P = 0.11) and 24 months (RR = 0.50, P = 0.028) of continuous therapy. In univariate analysis (Kaplan-Meier), MMF was associated with improved patient (P = 0.0003) and graft (P<0.0001) survival vs AZA, and trends toward improved patient and graft survival in multivariate analyses.
Conclusions:
These findings demonstrate the efficacy of MMF-based immunosuppression in elderly transplant recipients and do not suggest an increased risk of death compared to treatment with AZA.
Insights
Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) improves kidney transplant outcomes in elderly patients, reducing late acute rejection and enhancing patient and graft survival compared to azathioprine (AZA). This study found no increased risk of death with MMF use.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Immunosuppression Therapy
- Transplantation Research
Background:
- Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is known to reduce acute rejection and improve survival post-kidney transplant compared to azathioprine (AZA).
- Concerns exist regarding a potential increased risk of infection-related death in elderly patients receiving MMF-based immunosuppression.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy and safety of MMF versus AZA in elderly primary renal allograft recipients.
- To compare rates of acute rejection, graft survival, and patient survival between MMF and AZA treatment groups.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 5069 elderly (>65 years) primary renal allograft recipients from 1988-2000.
- Comparison of outcomes including acute rejection, graft survival, and patient survival between MMF and AZA treatment groups using Cox proportional hazard models and Kaplan-Meier analysis.
Main Results:
- MMF was associated with significantly lower rates of late acute rejection at 24 months (RR = 0.50, P = 0.028).
- Kaplan-Meier analysis showed MMF significantly improved patient (P = 0.0003) and graft (P<0.0001) survival compared to AZA.
- Multivariate analyses indicated trends toward improved patient and graft survival with MMF.
Conclusions:
- MMF-based immunosuppression is effective in elderly kidney transplant recipients.
- The study did not find an increased risk of death in elderly recipients treated with MMF compared to AZA.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacokinetics in Geriatric Patients: Effect of Age on Drug Excretion
Pharmacokinetics in Geriatric Patients: Effect of Age on Drug Metabolism
Kidney Transplant II: Surgical Procedure
Pharmacogenetics of Phase II Enzymes: N-acetyltransferase, Thiopurine S-methyltransferase, UDP-glucuronosyltransferase
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Immunomodulatory Agents
Kidney Transplant I: Introduction
