Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Modelling functional integration: a comparison of structural equation and dynamic causal models.

W D Penny1, K E Stephan, A Mechelli

  • 1Wellcome Department of Imaging Neuroscience, University College London, London, United Kingdom. w.penny@fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk

Neuroimage
|October 27, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Topographic Variation in Human Neurotransmitter Receptor Densities Explains Differences in Intracranial EEG Spectra.

Human brain mapping·2025
Same author

Core beliefs in psychosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany)·2025
Same author

Neurofind: using deep learning to make individualised inferences in brain-based disorders.

Translational psychiatry·2025
Same author

Multivariate brain-behaviour associations in psychiatric disorders.

Translational psychiatry·2024
Same author

Psychosocial stress, interpersonal sensitivity, and social withdrawal in clinical high risk for psychosis: a systematic review.

Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany)·2023
Same author

The association between psychosocial stress, interpersonal sensitivity, social withdrawal and psychosis relapse: a systematic review.

Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany)·2023

This study reviews two methods for modeling brain connectivity using fMRI data: Structural Equation Models (SEMs) and Dynamic Causal Models (DCMs). Dynamic Causal Models are preferred for fMRI data due to their neuronal-level modeling approach.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Science
  • Brain Imaging Analysis

Background:

  • The brain operates on principles of functional integration and specialization, mediated by effective connectivity.
  • Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) is a key tool for studying brain activity and connectivity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and compare two primary approaches for modeling effective connectivity from fMRI data: Structural Equation Models (SEMs) and Dynamic Causal Models (DCMs).
  • To evaluate the underlying generative models and assumptions of SEMs and DCMs.
  • To determine the most suitable model for fMRI data based on its ability to capture neuronal-level changes.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature on Structural Equation Models (SEMs) and Dynamic Causal Models (DCMs) for fMRI data analysis.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparative analysis of the generative models, focusing on the distinction between neuronal and hemodynamic levels.
  • Application and demonstration of both models using fMRI data from a visual motion attention study.

    • Main Results:

    • Both SEMs and DCMs utilize model comparison frameworks to infer effective connectivity and its modulation by cognitive set.
    • DCMs differentiate between neuronal and hemodynamic levels, modeling how experimental inputs affect neurodynamics and subsequently hemodynamics.
    • SEMs directly link changes in effective connectivity to the covariance structure of observed hemodynamics.

    Conclusions:

    • Dynamic Causal Models (DCMs) are considered the preferred approach for fMRI data because they model effective connectivity changes at the neuronal level.
    • The review highlights the assumptions and limitations of both SEMs and DCMs.
    • DCM's neuronal-level modeling provides a more biologically plausible account of effective connectivity for fMRI.