Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 21, 2026

Multi-Modal Signals for Analyzing Pain Responses to Thermal and Electrical Stimuli
Published on: April 5, 2019
Malingering pain in the medicolegal context
George Mendelson1, Danuta Mendelson
1Department of Psychological Medicine, Monash University, Caulfield Pain Management and Research Centre, Caulfield, Victoria, Australia. george.mendelson@med.monash.edu.au
Abstract:
Malingering--the willful, deliberate, and fraudulent feigning or exaggeration of illness--was originally described as a means of avoiding military service. In present-day clinical practice, malingering may occur in circumstances where the person wishes to avoid legal responsibility or in situations where compensation or some other benefit might be obtained. In law, the term malingering is used in relation to persons to whom military regulations apply; in other situations, malingering is regarded as fraud and may lead to charges of perjury or criminal fraud. Assertions that an individual is malingering are particularly common in clinical settings where the complaint is of a subjective nature and is not accompanied by objectively demonstrable organic abnormalities. This may occur in relation to complaints of pain in situations where the person is entitled to receive pain-contingent compensation or is suing for damages. In this article, we will review the literature on pain and malingering and discuss attempts that have been made to develop methods and guidelines for the detection of malingered pain. There are, however, no valid clinical methods of assessment of possible malingering of pain. In our view, the ultimate issue of the veracity of the plaintiff is for the Court to decide, and epithets such as "malingerer" have no place in reports prepared for legal purposes by health care professionals.
Insights
Malingering, the fake or exaggerated illness for gain, is common in pain complaints. Currently, no valid clinical methods exist to detect malingered pain, leaving veracity to the courts.
Area of Science:
- Forensic Psychology
- Clinical Medicine
- Legal Medicine
Background:
- Malingering, defined as the willful feigning or exaggeration of illness, historically served to evade military duty.
- In contemporary settings, malingering is often linked to avoiding legal consequences or obtaining benefits like compensation.
- Legal contexts may use "malingering" for those under military regulations, while other instances are treated as fraud, potentially leading to perjury or criminal charges.
Observation:
- Assertions of malingering frequently arise in clinical practice, especially with subjective complaints lacking objective organic findings.
- This is particularly noted in pain complaints where individuals may be eligible for pain-contingent compensation or are involved in litigation.
- The article reviews literature on pain and malingering, exploring detection method development.
Findings:
- Despite attempts, no scientifically validated clinical assessment methods are available for detecting malingered pain.
- The subjective nature of pain complaints complicates objective evaluation for malingering.
Implications:
- Healthcare professionals should avoid using terms like "malingerer" in legal reports.
- The determination of a plaintiff's veracity in malingering claims ultimately rests with the court system.
- This highlights a gap in clinical assessment tools for subjective pain complaints with potential legal ramifications.
Related Concept Videos
Analgesia and Pain Management
Nociception
Torts II
Opioid Analgesics: Synthetic and Semisynthetic Opioids
Legal Guidelines for Documentation
Torts I
Intentional...

