The yield of laboratory investigations in children with infantile autism

B Kosinovsky1, S Hermon, R Yoran-Hegesh

  • 1Child Developmental Center, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Petah-Tiqva, Israel.

Insights

Laboratory investigations for infantile autism are often unrevealing. Molecular diagnosis for Fragile-X syndrome was the only effective test, identifying it in 3% of infants, though these cases did not show autistic regression.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Neurology
  • Developmental Pediatrics
  • Genetics

Background:

  • Infantile autism, a complex neurodevelopmental disorder, necessitates accurate diagnostic tools.
  • Evaluating the utility of various laboratory investigations is crucial for timely diagnosis and management.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the diagnostic yield of laboratory investigations in identifying causes of infantile autism.
  • To determine the effectiveness of electroencephalograms, neuroimaging, genetic studies, and metabolic workups.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of medical records from four child developmental centers and two pediatric psychiatric clinics.
  • Analysis of investigative procedures including electroencephalogram, neuroimaging, Fragile-X genetic testing, and metabolic workup in 132 autistic infants.

Main Results:

  • Fragile-X syndrome was identified in 2 out of 59 infants (3%) through molecular diagnosis; these infants were in the non-regressive group.
  • Electroencephalograms (n=132), neuroimaging (n=70), and metabolic workups (n=53) yielded no significant diagnostic findings.
  • Autistic regression occurred in 36% of infants (47/132) around 20 months of age.

Conclusions:

  • Molecular diagnosis for Fragile-X syndrome is the only laboratory investigation that contributed to the diagnosis in this cohort.
  • The study suggests a minimal etiological role for epilepsy, despite its frequent association with autism, as indicated by electroencephalogram findings.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos