Related Experiment Videos
Ascending aortic hemodynamics and one-year clinical events following percutaneous coronary intervention
Robert E Eckart1, Dale Yoo, Eric A Shry
1Cardiology Division, Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, TX 78234-6200, USA.
Insights
Increased pulse pressure (PP) may predict mortality, but this study found no significant link between PP and cardiac events after percutaneous coronary stenting. Aortic PP did not predict 1-year risk for major adverse cardiac events (MACE).
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Vascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- Increased pulse pressure (PP) is a known predictor of mortality and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in ambulatory patients.
- Previous reports suggest a potential link between elevated PP and worse outcomes after percutaneous coronary balloon angioplasty.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the association between pulse pressure (PP) and pulse pressure fraction (PPf) with clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting.
- To determine if PP or PPf predicts 1-year MACE following coronary stenting.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective review of 434 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary stenting.
- Analysis of clinical outcomes, including death, myocardial infarction, and revascularization, at 1 year post-procedure.
- Assessment of PP and PPf as potential predictors of these outcomes.
Main Results:
- Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) occurred in 17.9% of the study cohort within 1 year.
- No statistically significant difference in PP or PPf was observed between patients with and without adverse cardiac events.
- Neither PP nor PPf demonstrated predictive value for 1-year MACE in this stenting cohort.
Conclusions:
- Aortic pulse pressure at the time of percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting does not appear to predict the risk for cardiac events at 1 year.
- Findings contrast with previous reports linking PP to outcomes after balloon angioplasty, suggesting a different risk profile for stenting procedures.
- Further research may be warranted to fully elucidate the role of PP in the context of modern interventional cardiology.
Abstract:
Increased pulse pressure has been shown to predict mortality and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in large cohorts of ambulatory patients. There have been reports suggesting worsened outcome following percutaneous coronary balloon angioplasty in patients with increased pulse pressure. We reviewed 434 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary stenting to assess for clinical outcomes as a function of pulse pressure (PP) and pulse pressure fraction (PPf). At 1 year, MACE was identified in 17.9% of subjects. There was no statistically significant difference in PP or PPf in those subjects with and without death, myocardial infarction or revascularization. Although previously reported to have correlation with risk for revascularization following balloon angioplasty, aortic pulse pressure at the time of percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting does not predict the risk for cardiac events at 1 year.
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation