Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Death, dignity, and moral nonsense.

Daryl Pullman1

  • 1Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.

Journal of Palliative Care
|October 30, 2004
PubMed
Summary

Human dignity is crucial for moral discussions, especially concerning end-of-life decisions. This paper clarifies two types of dignity—basic and personal—to prevent moral ambiguity and improve ethical reasoning.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Canadian MAiD and the Death of Dignity.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2025
Same author

Patient Preferences in Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy (ARVC) Screening and ICD Implantation: Canadian ARVC Registry Substudy.

CJC open·2025
Same author

Navigating the Landscape of Translational Geroscience in Canada: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Current Progress and Future Directions.

The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences·2024
Same author

Exploring Canadian genetic counselors' perspectives and experiences with discussing medical assistance in dying (MAiD).

Journal of genetic counseling·2024
Same author

Goldilocks and the Thanatron: A Response to Open Peer Commentaries.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2023
Same author

Public attitudes towards genomic data sharing: results from a provincial online survey in Canada.

BMC medical ethics·2023

Area of Science:

  • Bioethics
  • Moral Philosophy
  • Medical Ethics

Background:

  • The concept of human dignity is frequently used in end-of-life decision-making contexts.
  • Ambiguity surrounding human dignity has led to questioning its utility in moral discourse.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To argue for the indispensability of human dignity in moral discourse.
  • To clarify the concept of human dignity by distinguishing between basic and personal dignity.
  • To explore the implications for end-of-life decision-making.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of human dignity.
  • Distinguishing between "basic dignity" and "personal dignity" conceptions.
  • Examining the role of dignity as a universal meaning constraint in moral discourse.

Main Results:

  • Human dignity is an indispensable concept for moral discourse.
  • Two distinct conceptions, basic dignity and personal dignity, are identified and differentiated.
  • Basic dignity acts as a universal constraint on moral discourse, preventing nonsensical arguments.

Conclusions:

  • Dispensing with human dignity would lead to moral incoherence.
  • Clarifying the concept of human dignity is essential, not abandoning it.
  • A clearer understanding of dignity enhances ethical considerations in end-of-life decision-making.
Keywords:
Death and Euthanasia

Related Experiment Videos