Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Culture and intelligence.

Robert J Sternberg1

  • 1PACE Center, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520-8358, USA. robert.sternberg@yale.edu

The American Psychologist
|October 30, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Understanding intelligence requires considering its cultural context. Studying intelligence without cultural context risks biased generalizations and overlooks diverse cognitive skills. True intelligence assessment must be culturally sensitive.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Scientific Impact and Its Role in Scientific Reasoning.

Journal of Intelligence·2025
Same author

A WICS-based model for women's leadership.

Frontiers in psychology·2025
Same author

Why Critical Thinking Can and Often Does Fail Us in Solving Serious Real-World Problems: A Three-Track Model of Critical Thinking.

Journal of Intelligence·2025
Same author

Are "Extracurricular" Activities Really Extracurricular? The Activities That Matter Least in School Are the Ones That Best Teach Real-World Critical and Creative Thinking.

Journal of Intelligence·2025
Same author

Reframing Social and Emotional Development of the Gifted.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2024
Same author

Do Not Worry That Generative AI May Compromise Human Creativity or Intelligence in the Future: It Already Has.

Journal of Intelligence·2024
Same journal

Cumulative adverse childhood experiences and parent-reported allergic conditions and asthma among U.S. children: A nationally representative study.

The American psychologist·2026
Same journal

Natural disaster, social cohesion, and prosociality: A natural experiment.

The American psychologist·2026
Same journal

Practice guidelines regarding psychologists' involvement in pharmacological issues.

The American psychologist·2026
Same journal

International Competences for Undergraduate Psychology (ICUP): A constructive shift for psychology?

The American psychologist·2026
Same journal

Two dimensions of access: Availability and affordability of mental health care across the United States.

The American psychologist·2026
Same journal

Revisiting secondary antisemitism: Antisemitism as a cause, not a consequence, of ingroup-serving Holocaust distortions.

The American psychologist·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Anthropology
  • Cross-cultural studies

Background:

  • Intelligence is often studied in isolation from its cultural milieu.
  • Acontextual approaches risk imposing external biases and overlooking diverse cognitive expressions.
  • Research within a single culture may lead to oversimplified conclusions about intelligence.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the critical role of cultural context in understanding intelligence.
  • To highlight the limitations of acontextual intelligence research.
  • To advocate for culturally sensitive approaches in intelligence assessment and development.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of studies demonstrating the impact of culture on intelligence.
  • Analysis of how cultural factors influence the investigation and assessment of intelligence.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of the implications for intelligence development.

    • Main Results:

    • Intelligence is intrinsically linked to cultural frameworks and values.
    • Acontextual intelligence research can lead to inaccurate and biased findings.
    • Cultural context is essential for a comprehensive understanding of human cognition.

    Conclusions:

    • Intelligence cannot be fully understood outside its specific cultural context.
    • Culturally informed research is necessary to avoid generalizations and appreciate cognitive diversity.
    • Future research and practice must prioritize cultural relevance in the study of intelligence.