Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Long-term implications of caesarean section.

C L Tower1, B K Strachan, P N Baker

  • 1School of Human Development, City Hospital, Nottingham, UK.

Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology : the Journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
|October 30, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Revision knee replacement surgery in the NHS: A BASK surgical practice guideline.

The Knee·2021
Same author

Provision of revision knee surgery and calculation of the effect of a network service reconfiguration: An analysis from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man.

The Knee·2020
Same author

Prenatal anxiety and obstetric decisions among pregnant women in Wuhan and Chongqing during the COVID-19 outbreak: a cross-sectional study.

BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2020
Same author

Assisted Vaginal Birth: Green-top Guideline No. 26.

BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2020
Same author

Safe delivery for pregnancies affected by COVID-19.

BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2020
Same author

Antenatal sildenafil citrate treatment increases offspring blood pressure in the placental-specific <i>Igf2</i> knockout mouse model of FGR.

American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology·2019
Same journal

Artificial intelligence for sexual, reproductive and maternal health in Latin America and the Caribbean: a scoping review.

Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology·2026
Same journal

Post-myomectomy age-specific ongoing pregnancy rates in women ≥37 years old: a retrospective non-comparative study.

Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology·2026
Same journal

Retraction Statement: Knowledge, attitude, and practice of obstetricians towards vaginal birth after caesarean in Egypt.

Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology·2026
Same journal

Beyond an incidental finding: Reframing persistent left superior vena cava as a marker of comprehensive foetal cardiovascular assessment.

Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology·2026
Same journal

Including support people in gestational diabetes mellitus education: Understanding providers' perspectives.

Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology·2026
Same journal

Sociodemographic factors shaping knowledge-attitude-behaviour pathways in postpartum fall prevention.

Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology·2026
See all related articles

Women who had a caesarean section in the 1990s experienced no negative effects on future fertility or pregnancy risks like miscarriage. Subsequent babies born via caesarean section were slightly smaller and delivered earlier.

Area of Science:

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Reproductive Health

Background:

  • Previous studies suggested caesarean section (CS) negatively impacts future fertility, miscarriage rates, and fetal weight.
  • However, these studies primarily focused on deliveries before 1980, potentially not reflecting modern obstetric practices.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate if the previously reported adverse effects of caesarean section on subsequent reproductive outcomes persist in women who delivered in the 1990s.
  • To provide updated information for women undergoing caesarean delivery.

Main Methods:

  • A cohort study identified 576 primiparous women who delivered via caesarean section between 1992-1993 and 576 matched controls.
  • Participants were followed for five years to assess time to next pregnancy/delivery, miscarriage/ectopic pregnancy rates, and number of subsequent children.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • No statistically significant differences were found between the caesarean section and control groups regarding time to next pregnancy/delivery, miscarriage/ectopic rates, or the number of subsequent children (P > 0.05).
  • Babies born to mothers in the caesarean section group were statistically smaller (median 3.4 kg vs. 3.5 kg) and delivered earlier (median 39 weeks vs. 40 weeks) compared to controls (P < 0.01).
  • These minor differences in fetal size and gestational age are likely attributable to a higher rate of elective caesarean sections in the study group.

Conclusions:

  • Caesarean section performed in the 1990s does not appear to negatively affect future fertility or increase the risk of miscarriage or ectopic pregnancy.
  • Women who have had a caesarean section can be reassured about their future reproductive health based on these findings.
  • The study refutes earlier reports linking caesarean section to long-term negative reproductive consequences.