Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 21, 2026

Making MR Imaging Child's Play - Pediatric Neuroimaging Protocol, Guidelines and Procedure
Published on: July 30, 2009
Infant sedation for MR imaging and CT: oral versus intravenous pentobarbital
Keira P Mason1, David Zurakowski, Linda Connor
1Department of Anesthesia, Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA. keira.mason@tch.harvard.edu
Insights
Oral pentobarbital sedation is as effective as intravenous for infants undergoing imaging. Oral pentobarbital offers a lower risk of respiratory complications, making it a suitable alternative for pediatric sedation.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric imaging
- Sedation techniques
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Sedation is crucial for pediatric imaging procedures like MRI and CT.
- Pentobarbital is a common sedative agent used in infants.
- Comparing oral and intravenous routes of administration is important for optimizing patient care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effectiveness and safety of oral (PO) versus intravenous (IV) pentobarbital sedation.
- To evaluate sedation outcomes in infants younger than 12 months undergoing MR imaging and CT scans.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of medical records for 2164 infants sedated between January 1997 and September 2003.
- Comparison of PO (4-8 mg/kg) and IV (2-6 mg/kg) pentobarbital groups.
- Analysis of sedation effectiveness (failure rates) and safety (adverse events, respiratory events).
Main Results:
- Sedation effectiveness was comparable between PO and IV groups (0.5% vs 0.3% failure rate).
- Time to sedation was significantly longer with PO (18 min) than IV (7 min).
- Incidence of abnormal oxygen saturation was significantly lower with PO (0.2%) compared to IV (0.9%).
Conclusions:
- Oral pentobarbital provides comparable effectiveness to IV pentobarbital for pediatric sedation.
- Oral pentobarbital is associated with a lower rate of respiratory complications.
- Oral pentobarbital should be considered for infant sedation regardless of IV catheter presence.
Purpose:
To compare the effectiveness and safety of oral (PO) versus intravenous (IV) pentobarbital sedation for magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and computed tomography (CT) in infants younger than 12 months.
Materials And Methods:
The institutional review board approved the review of medical records and determined informed consent to be unnecessary. All parents gave informed consent for patient sedation. Prior to MR imaging or CT, infants younger than 12 months were sedated with PO pentobarbital (4-8 mg per kilogram body weight) or IV pentobarbital (2-6 mg/kg), depending on the presence of an IV catheter or need for IV contrast medium. A computer database used to record sedation data was reviewed for data from January 1997 to September 2003. PO and IV sedation groups were compared for mean age, weight, dose, time to sedation, time to discharge, and duration of sedation with a two-sample Student t test. Multivariate analysis of covariance was used to determine whether differences in sedation time, time to discharge, and duration of sedation between groups were independent of age, weight, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification, dose, and type of procedure. Sedation effectiveness (outcome) was determined as the percentage of sedation failures in each group. Safety was determined separately for other adverse events as a total and for respiratory adverse events.
Results:
A total of 2164 infants received 2419 (1264 PO, 1155 IV) doses of pentobarbital for sedation. Weight and sex were comparable between groups. Time to sedation was significantly longer with PO than with IV pentobarbital (18 minutes +/- 11 vs 7 minutes +/- 7; P < .01), but time to discharge was similar, at approximately 108 minutes +/- 35. Total adverse events rate during sedation was not significantly different (0.8% [PO] vs 1.3% [IV]), but incidence of abnormal oxygen saturation (5% decrease from baseline, >1 minute duration) differed significantly (0.2% [PO] vs 0.9% [IV]; P = .02). Sedation effectiveness was comparable (failure rate, 0.5% [PO] vs 0.3% [IV]; P = .76).
Conclusion:
PO pentobarbital has comparable effectiveness and a lower rate of respiratory complications compared with IV pentobarbital in infants younger than 12 months; its use should be considered, regardless of presence of an IV catheter.
Related Concept Videos
Parenteral Anesthetics: Overview
Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...
Stages of General Anesthesia
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography