Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Learning from what went wrong--two case studies.

Rande H Grotefendt1, J Wayne Chastain

  • 1Plant Protection, Eastman Chemical Company, P.O. Box 7444, Longview, TX 75607, USA. rgrotefe@eastman.com

Journal of Hazardous Materials
|November 3, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Process equipment safety is crucial. This study reviews two case studies on process vessel design, highlighting how good design prevented damage and how process changes can cause failures, emphasizing the need for robust safeguards.

Related Experiment Videos

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same journal

Co-contamination of hybrid microplastics and PFOA/GenX alters rhizosphere bacterial-fungal communities and root performance of Eichhornia crassipes.

Journal of hazardous materials·2026
Same journal

Associations between prenatal per- and polyfluoroalkyl substance exposure and maternal fatty acid homeostasis: Nonmonotonic, compartment-specific patterns in plasma and red blood cells.

Journal of hazardous materials·2026
Same journal

PLA vs PE microplastics with cadmium: Time-dependent divergent and microbial disruption of soil carbon and nitrogen cycling in medicinal plant soils.

Journal of hazardous materials·2026
Same journal

A photoinitiated catalytic self-degrading composite material for efficient and stable Cu(II) directional adsorption was constructed based on the bridging synergy strategy.

Journal of hazardous materials·2026
Same journal

Can heavy metal accumulation in crops be mitigated by microbial inoculants? A meta-analysis and machine learning.

Journal of hazardous materials·2026
Same journal

Coupling electron snorkels with biogenic FeS<sub>x</sub>-associated interfacial structures enhances anaerobic petroleum hydrocarbon degradation.

Journal of hazardous materials·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Chemical Engineering
  • Process Safety
  • Equipment Design

Background:

  • Unexpected events in process equipment can have severe consequences.
  • Process equipment design plays a vital role in mitigating risks.
  • Operational errors and gradual process changes can lead to equipment failure.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review case studies on process vessel design and subsequent events.
  • To demonstrate how design choices impact equipment safety.
  • To identify lessons learned for preventing recurrence of failures.

Main Methods:

  • Review of two distinct case studies involving process vessel design.
  • Analysis of operational errors and their impact on equipment.
  • Examination of cumulative process changes leading to unexpected reactions.

Main Results:

  • Case Study 1: Original design minimized damage from an operational error; additional safeguards proposed for recurrence prevention.
  • Case Study 2: Gradual process modifications resulted in an unforeseen chemical reaction, causing vessel rupture.
  • Safeguards were identified and recommended for both scenarios.

Conclusions:

  • Effective process equipment design is fundamental to preventing catastrophic failures.
  • Continuous monitoring and management of process changes are essential for long-term safety.
  • Implementing layered safeguards enhances resilience against operational errors and unforeseen events.