Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 12, 2026

A Simple and Efficient Approach to Construct Mutant Vaccinia Virus Vectors
Published on: October 30, 2016
Sensitivity of prostate tumors to wild type and M protein mutant vesicular stomatitis viruses
Maryam Ahmed1, Scott D Cramer, Douglas S Lyles
1Department of Biochemistry, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA. mahmed@wfubmc.edu
Abstract:
Because of its potent ability to induce apoptosis, vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) is an attractive candidate as an oncolytic virus for tumor therapy. Previous studies have suggested that VSV selectively infects tumor cells due to defects in their antiviral responses making them more susceptible to VSV infection than normal cells. We tested this hypothesis in the prostate tumor system by comparing LNCaP and PC-3 prostate tumor cells to benign human prostatic epithelial cells from patient prostatectomy specimens. We compared the cell killing ability of a recombinant virus containing a wild-type (wt) M protein (rwt) and an isogenic M protein mutant virus (rM51R-M) that induces interferon (IFN) in infected cells and should display a greater selectivity for tumor cells. Our results showed that in single-cycle infection experiments, LNCaP cells were sensitive to killing by both wt and mutant viruses, while PC-3 cells were highly resistant to VSV-induced cell killing. LNCaP and benign prostate cells were similarly susceptible to both viruses, indicating that normal prostate cells are not inherently resistant to killing by VSV. In each of the cell lines, the rM51R-M virus induced similar levels of apoptosis to rwt virus, showing that the M protein does not play a significant role in apoptosis induction by VSV in these cells. In multiple-cycle infection experiments, LNCaP cells were more sensitive than benign prostatic epithelial cells to virus-induced cell killing by rM51R-M virus, but not rwt virus. Both viruses were equally effective at reducing LNCaP tumor volume in vivo following intratumoral and intravenous inoculation in nude mice, while PC-3 tumors were resistant to VSV treatment. None of the mice treated with rM51R-M virus died as a result of virus infection, while 50-71% of mice treated with rwt virus succumbed to virus infection. Similarly, when inoculated by the more sensitive intranasal route, the rM51R-M virus was less pathogenic than the rwt virus from which it was derived. These results indicate that M protein mutant viruses are superior candidates as oncolytic viruses for therapies of prostate tumors, but future strategies for use of VSV will require testing individual tumors for their susceptibility to virus infection.
Insights
Vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) shows potential as an oncolytic virus for prostate tumors. M protein mutant VSV demonstrated superior safety and efficacy in preclinical models, suggesting improved oncolytic virus therapy.
Area of Science:
- Virology
- Oncology
- Immunology
Background:
- Vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) is a promising oncolytic virus candidate due to its apoptosis-inducing properties.
- Tumor cells are hypothesized to be more susceptible to VSV infection due to impaired antiviral responses.
- Prostate cancer models were used to investigate VSV's oncolytic potential and selectivity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the oncolytic efficacy and selectivity of wild-type (wt) VSV and an M protein mutant VSV (rM51R-M) in prostate cancer.
- To compare the susceptibility of prostate tumor cells and benign prostatic epithelial cells to VSV infection.
- To assess the in vivo safety and efficacy of VSV variants in mouse models.
Main Methods:
- Single-cycle and multiple-cycle infection experiments were performed on LNCaP, PC-3, and benign prostate cells.
- Recombinant VSV with wild-type (rwt) and mutant (rM51R-M) M proteins were used.
- In vivo studies involved intratumoral, intravenous, and intranasal inoculation in nude mice.
Main Results:
- LNCaP cells were sensitive to VSV, while PC-3 cells were resistant. Benign prostate cells showed similar susceptibility to LNCaP cells.
- The M protein mutant virus (rM51R-M) showed increased efficacy in multiple-cycle infections and reduced pathogenicity compared to rwt VSV.
- Both VSV variants reduced LNCaP tumor volume in vivo, but rM51R-M exhibited significantly lower toxicity.
Conclusions:
- VSV exhibits differential efficacy against prostate cancer cell lines, with LNCaP being more susceptible than PC-3.
- M protein mutant VSV (rM51R-M) represents a safer and potentially more effective oncolytic virus for prostate tumor therapy.
- Individual tumor susceptibility testing is crucial for optimizing VSV-based oncolytic virotherapy strategies.

