Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Expected Value01:15

Expected Value

The expected value is known as the "long-term" average or mean. This means that over the long term of experimenting over and over, you would expect this average. The expected average is represented by the symbol μ. It is calculated as follows:In the equation, x is an event, and P(x) is the probability of the event occurring.The expected value has practical applications in decision theory.This text is adapted from Openstax, Introductory Statistics, Section 4.2 Mean or Expected Value and...
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cross validation of pharmacokinetic bioanalytical methods: Experimental and statistical design.

Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis·2024
Same author

Do people recover from the impact of COVID-19 social isolation? Social connectivity and negative affective bias.

Psychological medicine·2024
Same author

Profiles of objective and subjective cognitive function in Post-COVID Syndrome, COVID-19 recovered, and COVID-19 naïve individuals.

Scientific reports·2024
Same author

Correction to: Building on existing tools to improve chronic disease prevention and screening in public health: a cluster randomized trial.

BMC public health·2021
Same author

Building on existing tools to improve chronic disease prevention and screening in public health: a cluster randomized trial.

BMC public health·2021
Same author

Corrigendum to 'Associations between Facets and Aspects of Big Five Personality and Affective Disorders: Systematic Review and Best Evidence Synthesis' [Journal of Affective Disorders Volume 288 (2021), pages 175-188].

Journal of affective disorders·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 16, 2026

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

Prediction error for free monetary reward in the human prefrontal cortex.

N Ramnani1, R Elliott, B S Athwal

  • 1Wellcome Department of Imaging Neuroscience, Institute of Neurology, London, UK. n.ramnani@rhul.ac.uk

Neuroimage
|November 6, 2004
PubMed
Summary

Understanding reward prediction error in the human brain is crucial. This study reveals distinct frontotemporal circuits for unexpected rewards and reward omissions, advancing our knowledge of monetary reward processing.

More Related Videos

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 16, 2026

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Neuroimaging

Background:

  • Predicting future rewards is vital for primates.
  • Dopamine neurons in monkeys signal reward prediction errors.
  • Human brain mechanisms for monetary reward prediction error are poorly understood, especially when rewards are not behavior-contingent.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate human brain activity related to monetary reward prediction errors.
  • To differentiate neural responses to unpredicted rewards versus the failure of expected rewards.
  • To explore how these systems function when rewards are independent of actions.

Main Methods:

  • Event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was employed.
  • Participants predicted monetary rewards or non-rewards based on visual cues.
  • Cue-outcome contingencies were occasionally reversed, creating prediction errors.

Main Results:

  • Distinct frontotemporal circuits were activated by different prediction errors.
  • Failure of expected rewards activated the temporal cortex and frontal pole (Area 10).
  • Unpredicted rewards activated the orbitofrontal cortex, frontal pole, parahippocampal cortex, and cerebellum.

Conclusions:

  • Specific frontotemporal circuits are involved in processing monetary reward prediction errors in humans.
  • These findings suggest a role for these circuits in encoding cue-monetary reward associations.
  • The study highlights distinct neural pathways for processing positive and negative prediction errors.