Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Electrocardiogram interpretation in general practice.

Morten Sig Ager Jensen1, Janus Laust Thomsen, Svend Eggert Jensen

  • 1Department and Research Unit of General Practice, Skejby University Hospital, Aarhus C, Denmark. mj@alm.au.dk

Family Practice
|November 6, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The diagnostic accuracy of AI-assisted diabetic retinopathy screening in primary care: a prospective validation study.

Scandinavian journal of primary health care·2026
Same author

Indications of over- and undertreatment of hypothyroidism in primary care: a scoping review and evidence mapping.

Scandinavian journal of primary health care·2026
Same author

Efficacy of a novel home-based stretching program on fibromyalgia symptoms: a randomised controlled trial.

Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation·2026
Same author

Identifying factors influencing acceptance of artificial intelligence among general practitioners in Danish general practice: a cross-sectional web-based survey study.

Scandinavian journal of primary health care·2026
Same author

Experiences of delivering reablement to home-dwelling older persons: an interview study of community-based nursing assistants.

BMC geriatrics·2026
Same author

Can Foot Dermatophyte Infections Signal Future Diabetes Risk? Findings from a Register-based Study.

Acta dermato-venereologica·2026
Same journal

The Amapola Test: description of a novel screening tool for visual alterations in primary care.

Family practice·2026
Same journal

Deferred prescribing in practice: an observational study in community pharmacies in France during 2024-5 and feedback from pharmacists.

Family practice·2026
Same journal

Assessing the risk of drug-induced corrected QT interval prolongation in primary care.

Family practice·2026
Same journal

Universal-offer HIV testing amongst patients undergoing blood tests in primary care: results from a multi-centre study.

Family practice·2026
Same journal

Sustainable healthcare knowledge, experience and curricular perspectives: a cross-sectional survey within the European Young Family Doctors Movement network.

Family practice·2026
Same journal

General practice care models and satisfaction in Australian residential aged care homes: a national survey of GPs, practice nurses, and managers.

Family practice·2026
See all related articles

General practitioners (GPs) showed lower sensitivity but higher specificity in interpreting electrocardiograms (ECGs) compared to automated systems. GPs effectively corrected false positives, but vigilance is needed for true positives.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • General Practice
  • Medical Diagnostics

Background:

  • The 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) is a cornerstone in evaluating cardiac complaints for general practitioners (GPs).
  • Accurate interpretation of ECGs by GPs is crucial for effective patient management.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the ECG interpretation skills of GPs.
  • To evaluate the utility of automated ECG interpretations in general practice settings.

Main Methods:

  • A study involving 902 ECGs from individuals aged 31-51 in Ebeltoft, Denmark.
  • ECGs were interpreted by GPs, an automated ECG recorder, and a cardiologist (gold standard).
  • Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were calculated for all interpretations.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • GPs demonstrated significantly lower sensitivity (69.8%) compared to the automated recorder (84.4%).
  • GPs exhibited significantly higher specificity (85.7%) than the automated recorder (75.6%).
  • GPs excelled at identifying and correcting false-positive diagnoses from the automated system.

Conclusions:

  • GPs effectively mitigate false-positive ECG diagnoses from automated systems.
  • GPs should carefully review automated diagnoses of ST-segment deviation, T-wave inversion, and Q-waves to prevent false negatives.
  • Optimizing ECG interpretation in general practice requires a balance between automated analysis and clinical judgment.