Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Automating research data collection.

Jason S Shapiro1, Michael J Bessette, Kevin M Baumlin

  • 1Mount Sinai School of Medicine, 1 Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1620, New York, NY 10029, USA. jason.shapiro@mssm.edu

Academic Emergency Medicine : Official Journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
|November 6, 2004
PubMed
Summary

Automated data collection methods like scannable forms, web forms, and handheld computers offer distinct advantages over traditional paper forms. Evaluating these options ensures efficient and accurate research data collection.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

OHCA-EXTRACT: Evaluating the Accuracy of a Large Language Model Pipeline for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Case Identification and Utstein Variable Extraction.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

B-Type Natriuretic Peptide as a Marker of Subclinical Heart Disease in a High-Burden Emergency Department Population With Sustained Asymptomatic Hypertension.

International journal of hypertension·2026
Same author

Identifying Bias at Scale in Clinical Notes Using Large Language Models.

Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health·2025
Same author

Awareness of Racial Bias in Pulse Oximetry among Practicing Neonatologists: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

Neonatology·2025
Same author

Pathway for a Diverse and Sustainable Emergency Medicine Clinician-Scientist Workforce: Recommendations From the 2024 SAEM Consensus Conference.

Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine·2025
Same author

Receipt of Buprenorphine and Naltrexone for Opioid Use Disorder by Race and Ethnicity and Insurance Type.

JAMA network open·2025

Area of Science:

  • Health Informatics
  • Clinical Research Methods
  • Data Management

Background:

  • Traditional data collection relies on manual entry from paper forms, which is time-consuming and prone to errors.
  • Advancements in technology offer automated data collection methods with potential benefits for research efficiency and data integrity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To comprehensively review and compare three automated data collection methods: scannable data forms, Web-based forms, and handheld computers.
  • To evaluate these methods against traditional paper-based data entry across various critical parameters.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative review of automated data collection techniques.
  • Analysis of ease of use, required expertise, training needs, costs, flexibility, speed, accuracy, data loss potential, technical support, and system requirements.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Inclusion of case studies demonstrating practical applications.

    • Main Results:

    • Automated methods generally offer improved speed and accuracy compared to manual data entry.
    • Each automated method presents unique trade-offs regarding cost, flexibility, and technical requirements.
    • Scannable forms, web-based forms, and handheld computers vary in their suitability for different study designs and contexts.

    Conclusions:

    • The selection of an automated data collection method should be tailored to the specific needs and constraints of the research study.
    • Understanding the capabilities and limitations of each technology is crucial for optimizing data collection processes in research.
    • Automated data collection holds significant potential for enhancing the quality and efficiency of scientific research.