Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Does respect for embryos entail respect for gametes?

Alfonso Gómez-Lobo1

  • 1Department of Philosophy, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20057, USA. gomezloa@georgetown.edu

Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics
|November 9, 2004
PubMed
Summary

This study argues that human embryos deserve respect due to potentiality, but this does not logically extend to gametes. It differentiates two types of potentiality, refuting the reductio ad absurdum argument against embryo respect.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Happiness and "human flourishing".

Health affairs (Project Hope)·2008
Same author

A note on metaphysics and embryology.

Theoretical medicine and bioethics·2007
Same author

Individuality and human beginnings: a reply to David DeGrazia.

The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics·2007
Same author

Sixteen days? A reply to B. Smith and B. Brogaard on the beginning of human individuals.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2006
Same author

Production of pluripotent stem cells by oocyte-assisted reprogramming: joint statement with signatories.

The national Catholic bioethics quarterly·2006
Same author

On potentiality and respect for embryos: a reply to Mary Mahowald.

Theoretical medicine and bioethics·2005

Area of Science:

  • Bioethics
  • Philosophy of Biology
  • Embryology

Background:

  • The potentiality argument is a common basis for defending respect for human embryos.
  • Opponents challenge this by extending the argument to gametes, questioning the logical consistency.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To refute the reductio ad absurdum argument that challenges the potentiality basis for embryo respect.
  • To analyze the concept of potentiality in the context of human embryonic development and gametes.

Main Methods:

  • Philosophical analysis of the concept of potentiality.
  • Distinguishing between different types of potentiality.
  • Logical argumentation to deconstruct the reductio ad absurdum claim.

Main Results:

Keywords:
Analytical ApproachBiomedical and Behavioral ResearchGenetics and ReproductionPhilosophical Approach

Related Experiment Videos

  • Identified two distinct types of potentiality relevant to the argument.
  • Demonstrated that the transitivity of potentiality does not hold between embryos and gametes.
  • Showed that the potentiality of embryos does not logically necessitate the potentiality of gametes.

Conclusions:

  • The potentiality argument for embryo respect is logically defensible.
  • Respect for human embryos based on potentiality does not logically entail respect for gametes.
  • The reductio ad absurdum argument against embryo respect is invalid.